ShareThis Page

Clerk abducted from Western Michigan gas station

| Sunday, April 28, 2013, 10:03 p.m.

NORTON SHORES, Mich. — Western Michigan authorities said on Sunday they believe a 25-year-old gas station clerk was abducted as she prepared to close for the day, and they released a description of a vehicle and a man seen in the area.

Police in the Muskegon suburb of Norton Shores held a news conference and asked for clues in the disappearance of Jessica Heeringa.

Norton Shores police Chief Dan Shaw said it appears Heeringa was preparing to close the Exxon Mobil on Friday night, MLive.com and WOOD-TV reported. Police said customers found the station open but no employees around.

Police found Heeringa's purse with cash inside and other belongings at the station. No money was missing from the register, they said.

Police were searching for a silver minivan, possibly a Chrysler Town & Country. They say the driver was a white man, age 30-40, about 6 feet tall, with center-parted, light brown wavy hair.

Heeringa is described as 5-foot-1 and 110 pounds with blonde hair.

Shelly Heeringa said she told her daughter several times that she worried about her working late by herself.

“She said, ‘Mom, don't worry. I can handle anybody,' ” Shelly Heeringa said.

There were no security cameras operating at the station at the time of Jessica Heeringa's disappearance.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.