Poll: Few Americans interested in immigration debate
WASHINGTON — For all the attention given so far to efforts in Congress to overhaul the nation's immigration laws, nearly four in 10 Americans say they don't know enough about it to have an opinion, and fewer than one-quarter could correctly answer a couple of basic questions about it, a new poll shows.
The survey, by the Pew Research Center, underscores an important fact in the immigration debate — most of the public has not yet tuned in. A bipartisan proposal negotiated by eight senators has gathered considerable strength, and Senate debate is scheduled to start next week, but because so many Americans remain unengaged, predictions about the bill's fate almost certainly remain premature.
Just more than half of those surveyed said either that they did not think the immigration bill would have much impact one way or the other on the economy or that they didn't know what impact it would have.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- Use of U.S. steel to fix Alaska terminal causes rift with Canada
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar
- End ‘mindless’ military spending caps, Aerospace Industries Association says
- U.S., Cuba patching torn relations with historic accord
- Republican lawmakers vow to block confirmation of any potential ambassador to Cuba
- Lifting limits on Cuba a boon for U.S.
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Health care law sign-up deadline extended
- Fracking essentially banned in N.Y.
- Conn. dentist’s license suspended over death