U.S. to focus on economy with Mexico
WASHINGTON — President Obama is seeking to refocus economic relations between the United States and Mexico, even as fresh questions about security cooperation threaten to cast a shadow over the president's visit to the southern neighbor.
Obama will use his three-day trip, which begins on Thursday and includes a stop in Costa Rica, to highlight the immigration overhaul moving through Capitol Hill, both for an audience in Latin America and for those back home in the states.
The president is scheduled to arrive Thursday afternoon in Mexico City for meetings with President Enrique Pena Nieto and members of Mexico's business community.
Since taking office in December, Pena Nieto has moved to end the widespread access it gave U.S. security agencies helping fight drug trafficking and organized crime. The changes mark a dramatic shift from the policies of Pena Nieto's predecessor, Felipe Calderon, who was lauded by the United States for boosting cooperation between the two countries as he led an aggressive attack on Mexico's drug cartels.
The White House has tried to downplay a potential rift, with officials emphasizing Mexico has kept the United States informed about the changes. Obama on Tuesday said he would wait to hear directly from his Mexican counterpart before assessing the changes.
Despite the intense focus on security issues, Obama advisers say the president will try to show that the ties between the two countries are broader than the drug wars that defined the relationship in recent years.
“Security has been so front-and-center in the public discussion of the U.S.-Mexico relationship that lost in that is the enormous commercial relationship between the two countries,” said Ben Rhodes, Obama's deputy national security adviser.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Navy developing robotic fish drone
- Smoking, drinking falls off among teens, but not drug use
- Gettysburg national park poised to expand by 45 acres
- West Virginia man dies after being shot with arrow in Wellsburg
- Harvard study bolsters link between pollution, autism
- Sen. McConnell wants to stop coal rules
- New York move to ban fracking heartens critics
- Casey, Toomey prod FCC to clear Comcast, Time Warner deal
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- New York Times reporter James Risen may be offered deal to avoid jail
- Lawmakers won’t toast to powdered alcohol