Piece of 9/11 plane removed from between 2 buildings near World Trade Center site
NEW YORK — Using a pulley system and sheer brawn, police removed a suspected 9/11 plane part from between two buildings near the World Trade Center site, and the medical examiner said no potential human remains had been found there.
About a dozen officers raised the jagged, 255-pound metal piece, which contains cranks, levers and bolts from the ground. They took it over a three-story wall, lowered it into a courtyard, and they carried it through the basement of a planned mosque, where it was discovered by an inspector last week.
Onlookers across the street took pictures as they heaved it onto a truck taking it to a Brooklyn police facility. The process took about two hours.
“It's a piece of history, and we tried to preserve it as best we could,” said NYPD Deputy Chief William Aubry, who leads the forensic investigation division. Aubry said they didn't do any damage to the piece when they moved it.
The part was discovered a week ago, wedged in a narrow space between a luxury apartment building and the mosque that prompted a national debate about Islam and freedom of speech because it's located just blocks from the World Trade Center site. An inspector doing construction work at the mosque site noticed it from the rooftop.
Authorities believe the rusted wing part is from one of the two hijacked airliners that brought down the trade center on Sept. 11, 2001.
The 5-foot piece was initially thought to be a piece of landing gear, but officials later determined it was a trailing edge flap support structure. Located close to the body of the plane, the part helps secure wing flaps that move in and out and aid in regulating speed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Construction of giant bridges sparks curiosity, high demand for public tours
- ‘Fast, Furious’ pistol was sold to gunman in foiled Texas terrorist attack
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- Minn. dentist laying low in slaying of lion
- Fires’ fury unabated in California
- San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Blankenship defense wants Upper Big Branch explosion evidence kept away from jury
- Planned Parenthood official says no profit from fetal organs