TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Foundation to criticize immigration measure's cost

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Bloomberg News
Friday, May 3, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Jim DeMint, who retired from the Senate to head the Washington-based Heritage Foundation, will lead an attack on a proposed immigration overhaul with a report from the conservative institute on the costs government would bear in offering a path to citizenship for 11 million undocumented workers in the country.

The report is expected as the Senate Judiciary Committee starts weighing the immigration bill next week.

Heritage will build its case on the presumption that legalizing undocumented immigrants will increase participation in already strained federal programs such as Social Security, which provides retirement benefits for the elderly, Medicare and Medicaid, which provide health care for the elderly and impoverished, and food stamps, public assistance for the poor.

Heritage wouldn't reveal its newest figures before the release of its report. In 2007, the last time Washington took a stab at an immigration bill, the foundation presented research showing that low-skilled immigrants paid significantly less in taxes than they received in government assistance, leading to long-term taxpayer costs of more than $2 trillion in the revision that lawmakers were debating.

Advocates of the immigration measure, which has bipartisan support, point to congressional data showing that the potential costs are exaggerated and cite the economic benefit of legally employing millions of people.

“The cost issue is the big test point that critics have to make,” said Alex Nowrasteh, immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute, a libertarian policy group in Washington, who views the possible costs to government programs as overstated.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Food industry players fighting proposed dietary guidelines drop millions on lobbyists
  2. 2 women advance to final phase of Army Ranger training
  3. U.S., Hong Kong researchers develop computer model to examine spread of influenza
  4. Pressure mounts for Biden to join 2016 White House race
  5. Construction of giant bridges sparks curiosity, high demand for public tours
  6. Bee vaccination study gives insight, could aid food production
  7. 4 dead, 65 sickened in Bronx by Legionella
  8. ‘Fast, Furious’ pistol was sold to gunman in foiled Texas terrorist attack
  9. Marines finally ready to roll out controversial fighter jet
  10. Obama’s nuclear deal lobbying sways Democrats
  11. State Department accuses top Clinton aide of violations