Texas' Sen. Cruz attracts GOP gaze in S.C. talk
By The Washington Post
Published: Saturday, May 4, 2013, 8:39 p.m.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Ted Cruz has spent less than six months in the U.S. Senate, but he fueled speculation about his political ambitions on Friday night with a coveted speaking role at a state Republican Party dinner in South Carolina, which holds an early presidential primary.
In a speech designed to rally the state party's most faithful activists, Cruz, R-Texas, sharply criticized the Obama administration for “pushing an agenda aggressively to come after our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.”
He thanked the state's conservative voters for helping stop the Senate from passing restrictions on guns despite widespread support for some of the proposals.
Cruz, 42, urged Republicans not to become complacent in the aftermath of the party's electoral losses last year.
“Change happens quickly,” the senator said, recalling that Democrats had warned of a “permanent Republican majority” in 2005.
“In 2006, we lost Congress; 2008, Barack Obama got elected; 2009, Obama-care passes; and here we are today,” Cruz said.
He later said, “I am convinced, with your help, that we're going to take back the U.S. Senate in 2014.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Senator: CIA improperly searched computer network
- Obama hams it up for health care on Funny or Die
- Snowden captivates tech crowd
- D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal ‘shadow campaign’
- Lanza’s father says he wishes son was never born
- Deaths from heroin, pain pills called ‘urgent,’ growing’ crisis
- Depth, distance reduce impact of quake off California’s northern coast
- Parents of ‘spoiled’ teen urge her to return home
- Fannie, Freddie profits surprise
- General’s court-martial is thrown into jeopardy
- Climate contraptions get real consideration