Al-Jazeera entrenchment in U.S. raises fear of promoting anti-Semitism
Published: Monday, May 6, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Some say a dozen Al-Jazeera news bureaus across the country could offer greater coverage of world issues. Some, though, fear it could promote anti-Semitism.
The news organization, which bought Al Gore's Current TV for $500 million this year, will begin broadcasting Al-Jazeera America this summer.
“We're trying to have bureaus in places where other networks do not,” said Bob Wheelock, executive producer of Al-Jazeera English.
Bureaus are to be opened in New York, Washington, Miami, Nashville, Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle, according to Politico.
Al-Jazeera America probably will be very similar to other news networks, said Saleh Sbenaty, a Middle Tennessee State University engineering professor and a board member of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, Tenn.
“It would be good for people to hear different voices to get a different point of view and coverage of issues that might not be covered by the media here,” he said.
A critic said she would welcome the network's presence in Nashville, but for a different reason.
“I'm not opposed to them coming in, because a lot of people do not know of Al-Jazeera's anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish and anti-Israel bias,” said Laurie Cordoza-Moore, president of the pro-Israel group Proclaiming Justice to the Nations, based in Franklin, Tenn.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Lawmakers vote to bar ‘upskirt’ photos in Massachusetts
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Crisis stymies Obama getaway
- ‘Drug czar’ cleared to lead Border Patrol