Republicans to back Obama's student loan plan
WASHINGTON — House Republicans are willing to give President Barack Obama a rare win, the chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee said Thursday in outlining a deal that would let college students avoid a costly hike on their student loans.
Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., told The Associated Press that his GOP-led panel would support an idea included in Obama's budget proposal that links the interest rates on student loans to market rates. To calm fears of runaway interest rates, Kline said his proposal also would include a cap on interest rates that was not part of Obama's proposal.
“At the end of the day, we believe that what we've done with this bill is make sure that the borrowers, whether they're graduates or undergraduates or parents, can take advantage of the lower rates when they're available,” Kline said.
Kline's proposal also would end different interest rates for subsidized and unsubsidized undergraduate loans. Both would pay the same rates, which would be linked to 10-year Treasury notes.
Federally subsidized Stafford student loan rates will double on July 1, unless Congress steps in. During the recession that began in December 2007, Congress temporarily lowered the interest rates, bottoming out at 3.4 percent to help struggling students. The rates were scheduled to return to the pre-recession level of 6.8 percent last July 1, before Congress and the White House agreed during the presidential campaign to a one-year reprieve.
Lawmakers and advocates from across the political spectrum have said that the looming interest rate hike is foolish and easily avoidable. But there has been little agreement on how, exactly, to stop it, and without the White House up for grabs, the urgency on the issue had faded. The increase could cost students an extra $1,000 on new loans.
Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., has proposed a two-year freeze on student loans while a broader deal could be reached. Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., offered another option that would permanently cap student loan rates at the 3.4 percent.
And a collection of Democratic lawmakers on Thursday renewed their push to keep rates low but also backed interest rates that were based on the markets. Their plan would base rates on a 91-day Treasury bill and allow the Education Department to add to that to pay for the administration of loan programs.
“The student loan interest rate offered by the government shouldn't be needlessly high, it should be based on actual costs,” Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said in introducing the plan.
The versions from both parties include a proposal that was central to Obama's budget: interest rates would shift based on financial markets.
Basing student loans on 10-year Treasury notes' rates would, at least for now, offer a deal to some students.
For instance, students taking Stafford loans would pay 2.5 percent above the Treasury 10-year rate. That would translate to 4.3 percent for undergraduate loans - an increase from the 3.4 percent now paid by students who receive a subsidized Stafford loan and a decrease from the 6.8 percent for other students who do not receive a subsidized Stafford loan.
For other loans typically taken by parents or graduate students - called PLUS loans — the rates would be the 4.5 percentage points higher than the rate on the 10-year Treasury note. That would translate to 6.3 percent interest for PLUS loans taken this week — a decrease from the 7.9 percent fixed rate currently offered.
Perkins Loans, offered to students who demonstrate financial need, would not be touched in Kline's proposal.
During the 2010-11 academic year, about 7.5 million undergraduates borrowed from the subsidized Stafford loan program. In all, there were 36 million students loan borrowers through federal programs, according to the Education Department.
Both parties' proposals would limit how far interest rates could climb when Treasury changes its outlook.
Undergraduate Stafford loans would be limited to 8.5 percent interest and PLUS loans would have a 10.5 percent ceiling under the GOP proposal.
The Democrats' plan would keep cap subsidized Stafford loans at 6.8 percent and other programs would be capped at 8.25 percent - still a potential increase for students.
Kline said House Republicans could take the proposal to a vote on the House floor by month's end.
As for the politics, Kline said he has no problem agreeing with Obama's premise.
“That's fine and dandy. I was pleased to see him put forward that in the budget. I have to tell you, I didn't have much admiration for the rest of the budget,” Kline said. “This coming up with a market-based student loan interest rate for the long term, I like it. I am very happy for the president on this one.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- AG vows to help better Baltimore police
- 56 years later, Ohio fugitive captured in Florida
- Federal appeals court flips on cell location records ruling in Florida
- State AGs lambaste climate proposal, predicting higher electricity prices, job losses
- VA probe ‘for show,’ cardiologist claims
- Texas attack called ‘textbook’ lone-wolf case
- Familiarity guides Obama’s picks to lead Joint Chiefs
- Researchers find new, elusive bird species
- $5.6B in education tax credits dubious
- First, ‘Watson’ wins ‘Jeopardy’; now, he helps treat cancer
- 10-year hurricane drought in U.S. called dumb luck