Spacewalk planned to fix 'serious' ammonia leak at International Space Station
WASHINGTON — Two astronauts will make a precedent-setting spacewalk on Saturday to try to fix an ammonia leak in the power system of the International Space Station.
Station Commander Chris Hadfield of Canada reported on Thursday seeing “a very steady stream of flakes.” He tweeted, “It is a serious situation.”
Spacewalks are rarely done on such short notice, but the space agency says the six-member crew is not in danger.
The ammonia leak forced the shutdown of one of eight solar panels that power the station, but the outpost can operate fine with only seven, spokesman Kelly Humphries said.
One of the spacewalk veterans slated for the job is due to return to Earth on Monday, one of the reasons NASA wants to tackle the problem this weekend, he said.
Hadfield told NASA flight controllers on Friday that the six-member crew is completely ready for the spacewalk.
“I think it's really smart the way we're all proceeding here,” Hadfield radioed down to Earth.
The leak is in one of the radiator lines that chill the power systems. NASA spokesman Rob Navias said the line was expected to run out of ammonia coolant Friday. Power has been rerouted and is operating normally, he said.
“What's causing the leak is unknown,” Navias said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- University of Wisconsin researchers work to customize vegetables for specific uses
- New heart failure drug works much better than current treatment, study finds
- Mom charged in girl’s death in line for $1M from her trust fund
- Cleveland welcomes server farms
- Obama backs off immigration vow
- Some states say discrimination against sick creeping back under Obamacare
- GMOs: Science and skepticism
- Senate to look at earthquake risks at California nuke plant
- Female sergeant barricades self in Fort Lee building, commits suicide
- Wis. woman identified shooter before dying, court papers show
- Texas man cleared of shooting drunken driver who killed his 2 sons