Man who got naked at Oregon airport fights fine
PORTLAND, Ore. — John Brennan, who stripped naked last year to protest a security check in Portland's airport, said he expects to lose the first round of his legal fight against a $1,000 fine.
Still, he plans to press his free speech argument in an appeal and push for effective security checks that aren't as invasive.
“I totally support airport screening,” Brennan told The Oregonian. “I just don't want it to be at the expense of my constitutional rights.”
Brennan has a court date on Tuesday before an administrative law judge. His attorney, Robert Callahan, said the free speech argument won't be allowed as Brennan fights the fine, but an appeal in the federal court system would present an opportunity.
A call to the Transportation Security Administration for comment was not immediately returned.
In April 2012, as Brennan started a business trip to California, he declined to step into a TSA body scanner.
He took off his clothes to show he was not carrying anything explosive and to get the security check over quickly, he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Experts met in Nepal week ago to discuss earthquake they knew would rip into Kathmandu
- House demands details of Taliban detainees swap for Bergdahl
- Study a surprise: Commercial bees unfazed by pesticides
- Footage of protesters walking on flag sparks strife at Georgia university
- Magma chamber spied under Yellowstone volcano
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- 15 buffalo that escaped from farm killed in upstate N.Y.
- HIV cases tied to drug use multiply daily in Indiana
- Hostility at VA lingers, panel told
- Unhappiness over plan to unfreeze billions in oil revenue for Iran threatens nuclear bill in Senate
- Reagan shooter Hinckley closer to permanent freedom