IRS issues Tea Party apology
Conservative groups and political leaders rejected a top Internal Revenue Service official's apology for the agency's added scrutiny of activist groups during the 2012 reelection campaign of President Barack Obama.
“That was wrong,” said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups.
The IRS singled out about 75 organizations because they used the words “tea party” or “patriot” in applications for tax-exempt status, Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association. None had its tax-exempt status revoked, she said.
In some cases, the IRS scrutinized organizations' social media postings, sought information about family members and asked for lists of donors.
Under the tax code, 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups are allowed to participate in political activities but their primary activity must be social welfare. They are not required to disclose donors.
“That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate,” Lerner said of the additional scrutiny. “That's not how we go about selecting cases for further review.”
That's not enough for Tea Party organizer Jennifer Stefano, state director of Americans for Prosperity-Pennsylvania in Bucks County. Tea Party groups complained about the extra scrutiny last year.
“This tremendous violation of the rights of Americans warrants more than an apology. Action must be taken immediately to ensure this never happens again,” Stefano said.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky urged the White House to “conduct a transparent, government-wide review aimed at assuring the American people that these thuggish practices are not under way at the IRS or elsewhere in the administration against anyone, regardless of their political views.”
White House spokesman Jay Carney declared it was indeed inappropriate for the IRS to target Tea Party groups. But he brushed aside questions about whether the White House itself would investigate.
U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Butler, said he would support legislation to prevent similar behavior.
“That the levers of our government were used to harass certain citizens and undermine their First Amendment rights is, frankly, sickening. Such a blatant abuse of power by any federal agency or office cannot be tolerated and must be punished,” Kelly said.
Bruce Antkowiak, professor and program director of the criminology, law and society program at Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, said the extra scrutiny could spur changes much like the Watergate scandal did in the early 1970s.
The Associated Press and Bloomberg contributed to this report. Tom Fontaine is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Regulators approve tougher rules for Internet providers
- Hackers won’t take break if DHS shuts down, officials warn
- Battle of semantics breaks out over Obama’s description of war on terrorism
- Inhofe reverses on transporation bill
- Cuts curtail IRS customer service
- ‘Dysfunctional relationship’ between Obama, Netanyahu grows
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- South pelted with snowfall
- Family sees triple
- Gas leak responsible for house blast that injured 15 in New Jersey
- Justices seem sympathetic to hijab-wearing interviewee