IRS issues Tea Party apology
Conservative groups and political leaders rejected a top Internal Revenue Service official's apology for the agency's added scrutiny of activist groups during the 2012 reelection campaign of President Barack Obama.
“That was wrong,” said Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt groups.
The IRS singled out about 75 organizations because they used the words “tea party” or “patriot” in applications for tax-exempt status, Lerner said at a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association. None had its tax-exempt status revoked, she said.
In some cases, the IRS scrutinized organizations' social media postings, sought information about family members and asked for lists of donors.
Under the tax code, 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups are allowed to participate in political activities but their primary activity must be social welfare. They are not required to disclose donors.
“That was absolutely incorrect, it was insensitive and it was inappropriate,” Lerner said of the additional scrutiny. “That's not how we go about selecting cases for further review.”
That's not enough for Tea Party organizer Jennifer Stefano, state director of Americans for Prosperity-Pennsylvania in Bucks County. Tea Party groups complained about the extra scrutiny last year.
“This tremendous violation of the rights of Americans warrants more than an apology. Action must be taken immediately to ensure this never happens again,” Stefano said.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky urged the White House to “conduct a transparent, government-wide review aimed at assuring the American people that these thuggish practices are not under way at the IRS or elsewhere in the administration against anyone, regardless of their political views.”
White House spokesman Jay Carney declared it was indeed inappropriate for the IRS to target Tea Party groups. But he brushed aside questions about whether the White House itself would investigate.
U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Butler, said he would support legislation to prevent similar behavior.
“That the levers of our government were used to harass certain citizens and undermine their First Amendment rights is, frankly, sickening. Such a blatant abuse of power by any federal agency or office cannot be tolerated and must be punished,” Kelly said.
Bruce Antkowiak, professor and program director of the criminology, law and society program at Saint Vincent College in Latrobe, said the extra scrutiny could spur changes much like the Watergate scandal did in the early 1970s.
The Associated Press and Bloomberg contributed to this report. Tom Fontaine is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- U.S., Cuba patching torn relations with historic accord
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Lifting limits on Cuba a boon for U.S.
- Fracking essentially banned in N.Y.
- Republican lawmakers vow to block confirmation of any potential ambassador to Cuba
- Congress’ legacy: Way worse than ‘do-nothing’ one of 1947-48
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- Supreme Court says Arizona cannot withhold licenses from young immigrants who entered illegally
- End ‘mindless’ military spending caps, Aerospace Industries Association says
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar
- Warren’s hangups over trade agenda threaten party ties