Support grows for gay Scout members
A substantial majority of Americans support the Boy Scouts of America's proposal to admit openly gay members, and most oppose the organization's plan to continue to bar openly gay adults from serving as Scout leaders, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.
The century-old group's National Council will gather this month to vote on the plan, which would allow openly gay boys to be Scouts but would maintain a ban on gay Scout masters.
In splitting the decision, the group may be trying to modernize while continuing to respect a diversity of views on homosexuality — seven in 10 Scout groups are chartered by religious institutions.
In the latest poll, 63 percent of Americans support allowing gay boys to join the Scouts, and 56 percent oppose the ban on gay adults from Boy Scout leadership; 39 percent support the adult ban.
The results contrast with those of a USA Today/Gallup poll last year, in which only 42 percent of respondents said openly gay adults should be able to serve as Scout leaders.
Opposition to banning gay Scout leaders appears to vary by religious group and to follow well-worn political fault lines.
In the Post-ABC poll, 56 percent of Catholics oppose the ban on gay Scout masters. The number in opposition rises to 75 percent among people who identify as atheist, agnostic or no religion.
By contrast, Protestants are closely divided in the poll — 49 percent support and 47 percent oppose the ban on gay Scout leaders.
Partisanship also appears to play a role. In the poll, 68 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of independents oppose continuing the ban on gay Scout leaders; 61 percent of Republicans support continuing the ban.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- N.H. kidnapping suspect held on $1M bail
- Surgeon general echoes warnings about skin cancer
- Highway funding overhaul sought
- Girl struck by plane on beach succumbs
- Appeals court upholds nation of origin labels for meat
- Obama’s many rules often violate statute
- Lone clinic in Miss. for abortions still stands
- UCLA inundated by burst pipe
- Adoptive family waits in China for visa system to clear backlog
- Swift action expected of VA’s new secretary
- Met Museum of Art president to retire