New school pushed at scene of shooting in Newtown, Conn.
NEWTOWN, Conn. — A task force of elected officials on Friday recommended tearing down the elementary school where 20 first-graders and six educators were shot dead in December and rebuilding on the site.
The group of 28 Newtown elected officials voted unanimously in favor of a plan that would construct a building on the property where the existing Sandy Hook Elementary School is located. The proposal now goes to the local school board and then before voters as a referendum.
Parent Daniel Krauss, whose daughter is a second-grader, said he was pleased by the panel's recommendation.
“It's been a place for learning, for kids to grow up, and it's going to go back to that,” Krauss said.
The panel had narrowed a list of choices to renovating or rebuilding on the school site or building a school on property down the street. A study found building a school on the existing site would cost $57 million.
The 430 surviving students are attending a renovated school renamed Sandy Hook Elementary School in the neighboring town of Monroe.
If all goes well, officials said, construction could begin in the spring and the new building could open in January 2016.
Sandy Hook Elementary School has not housed students since the killings. Some town residents said the school should be torn down because they couldn't imagine sending children back there. Others favored renovating the school, with some saying that tearing it down would be a victory for evil.
Laura Roche, a member of the Sandy Hook School Task Force, said it's been “very emotional and very hard” to come to a decision about the school's future. But she was pleased by the unanimous vote — a signal the panel was united.
“We came together as 28, and I hope we can come together as a community to rebuild the spirit of our community and build the school together,” Roche said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
- Federal officials: Dallas nurse free of Ebola
- Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
- Open encrypted messages by updating technology access law, FBI Director Comey says
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
- 3 killed in Md. mid-air collision
- West Virginia University expels 3 students for postgame misconduct
- Man shot from behind, Wecht’s autopsy finds
- Court: IRS not targeting conservative tax-exempt groups
- Missouri officials faulted by feds for ‘selective’ probe in police shooting death