National Memorial Day parade loses sponsors
FILE - This Feb. 28, 2013 file photo shows a visitor viewing the National Mall from the Lincoln Memorial looking towards the Washington Monument and the U.S. Capitol in Washington. Plans to overhaul neglected sites on Washington's National Mall with lakeside gardens, grassy amphitheaters and restaurants with views of the nation's memorials are getting a boost from a German carmaker. Volkswagen of America announced a $10 million gift Thursday to the nonprofit Trust for the National Mall to jumpstart fundraising for the park. It's the largest private gift to date to restore the most-visited national park. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
Photo by AP
WASHINGTON — Organizers of the annual National Memorial Day Parade alongside the National Mall in Washington say they are short of sponsors for this year's event, and federal budget cuts are dimming participation from many in the military. But they say the May 27 celebration will still go forward.
A spokesman for the American Veterans Center, the parade organizer, said several Defense contractors that were top sponsors in previous years have pulled out or reduced their contributions, citing the federal budget cuts known as sequestration.
“A majority are Defense contractors,” said group spokesman Garrett Marquis. “They say they can't do it this year because their funding has been cut back by the Defense Department.”
Defense, which is absorbing half the $85 billion in cuts across the government this fiscal year, has scaled back many contracts.
But a spokesman for Boeing, one of the parade's key sponsors in the past three years, said sequestration wasn't responsible for the decision to pull funding.
“We decided not to renew our sponsorship,” said Dan Beck, spokesman for the Chicago-based firm. “We continually evaluate our sponsorship commitments around the world.”
Beck said Boeing decided to shift funds to other causes, but he would not elaborate. He declined to say how much Boeing contributed to the parade in the past.
The other sponsor that Marquis identified as pulling its commitment is the Department of Defense 60th Anniversary of the Korean War Commemoration Committee, a three-year project that recognizes the service of Korean War veterans. He declined to name other donors that have pulled funding.
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), a major Defense contractor based in Tysons Corner, Va., that has contributed to the parade in the past, did not return calls seeking comment.
The American Veterans Center has raised a little more than half of the $400,000 it needs for the parade this year, Marquis said. An unexpected donation last week from the Chamber of Commerce in Myrtle Beach, S.C., will allow the event to be broadcast on military TV stations, Marquis said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.