Tsarnaev brothers' link to 2011 murders explored
Ever since investigators solved one big mystery in April — identifying Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as suspected Boston Marathon bombers — an important new mystery has hung in the air: Did one or both of the brothers also have a role in an unsolved triple-murder case from 2011?
Some news reports say law enforcement officials are closer to making a connection.
In hindsight, one salient detail: On Sept. 11, precisely the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, three men were killed in a Waltham, Mass., apartment.
Two news organizations are reporting that local investigators are delving into forensic evidence and cellphone records that may link one or both Chechen brothers to the homicide.
The Boston outlet of Fox News cites sources with knowledge of the investigation, saying that Tamerlan Tsarnaev's cellphone “was used near the murder scene on the day of the triple homicide and his fingerprints were found inside the apartment.” But the sources caution that those details don't provide any definitive link between him and the murders.
ABC, similarly, says “some crime-scene forensic evidence provided a match to the two Tsarnaev brothers” and that cellphone records put both brothers “in the area of the murders on that date.”
Tamerlan was friends with one of the victims, Brendan Mess. They were once roommates and did boxing and martial-arts training together, ABC reported.
The triple-murder crime scene was gruesome. The victims were found with their necks slit and their bodies reportedly strewn with marijuana.
The crime occurred after a period in Tamerlan's life when, according to news reports, he had hit roadblocks in his aspirations to become an Olympic boxer.
He gave up drinking and smoking because of his Muslim religion — and grew more radical and impassioned in his religious views.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.