Knuckle sandwich results in charges in Mass.
QUINCY, Mass. — A Quincy woman is facing an assault charge for allegedly punching a restaurant worker for putting too many pickles on her steak and cheese sandwich, police said on Monday.
Tina Drouin, 49, ordered a sub from Nathan's Famous Hot Dogs in the Quincy Center subway/commuter rail station about 2 p.m. Saturday, according to police.
Drouin started loudly complaining, used profanity and made derogatory comments about the ratio of certain ingredients as the worker prepared the sandwich, police said.
Finally, she demanded a refund.
The worker refused.
That's when Drouin allegedly punched the female worker in the face and pushed over two large pickle jars, knocking the worker to the floor and shattering the jars, police said.
Drouin ran from the station with the worker in pursuit. The worker nabbed Drouin nearby outside city hall and held her until police arrived.
Drouin told police the episode began when the sandwich maker put “too many pickles” on her lunch. She complained to police of neck pain and was taken to a hospital.
She'll be summoned to Quincy District Court to face an assault charge, police said. The Associated Press couldn't locate a listed phone number for her.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Huge, ancient quasar could alter theories on black holes
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Governors: No clear plan if health care subsidies fall