ShareThis Page

Michigan woman's rape, cancer claims investigated as scams

| Friday, May 17, 2013, 9:36 p.m.
James Grissom, who was convicted in 2003 and sentenced 15 years in prison for the rape of Sara Ylen, looks out a window in Southgate, Mich. Ylen, who said she was battling cancer, is now charged with fraud, false pretenses and using a computer to commit a crime because state police found no doctor who diagnosed her cancer. The charges were made as those who regularly helped Ylen reel from the news that Grissom, who spent nearly 10 years in prison for her rape, was released last year after newly discovered evidence cast doubt on whether she'd ever been attacked.
James Grissom, who was convicted in 2003 and sentenced 15 years in prison for the rape of Sara Ylen, looks out a window in Southgate, Mich. Ylen, who said she was battling cancer, is now charged with fraud, false pretenses and using a computer to commit a crime because state police found no doctor who diagnosed her cancer. The charges were made as those who regularly helped Ylen reel from the news that Grissom, who spent nearly 10 years in prison for her rape, was released last year after newly discovered evidence cast doubt on whether she'd ever been attacked.
Sara Ylen, who gained sympathy after a 2002 rape and then rallied people when her cancer diagnosis became pubic, appears in court in Sandusky, Mich. Ylen, 38, is charged with fraud, false pretenses and using a computer to commit a crime after state police found no doctor who diagnosed cancer. The charges come as news that the man who spent nearly 10 years in prison for her rape was released last year after a judge said new evidence cast doubt on whether Ylen ever was attacked.
Sara Ylen, who gained sympathy after a 2002 rape and then rallied people when her cancer diagnosis became pubic, appears in court in Sandusky, Mich. Ylen, 38, is charged with fraud, false pretenses and using a computer to commit a crime after state police found no doctor who diagnosed cancer. The charges come as news that the man who spent nearly 10 years in prison for her rape was released last year after a judge said new evidence cast doubt on whether Ylen ever was attacked.

LEXINGTON, Mich. — Carol Connell remembers well the gift she gave Sara Ylen, a friend seemingly forced to bear too much misery.

Ylen, a Michigan mother of two young boys, said she was battling cancer just a few years after a man was convicted of her rape.

“It was a little box, a very ornate box, to hold a prayer. She needed God to look over her,” Connell said, recalling the 2008 lunch when she gave Ylen the gift. “Sara was visibly touched.”

Connell now can't help but wonder whether Ylen was showing gratitude or simply perpetuating years of jaw-dropping deceit.

Ylen's community, which had come to admire her as the subject of a newspaper's award-winning 2003 series about surviving a rape, rallied when her cancer diagnosis became public. Churches sold Super Bowl sub sandwiches and auctioned items to raise money. Friends cut her grass, bathed her in her modest home and provided hot meals. An insurance company paid nearly $100,000 for hospice care.

Now the 38-year-old is charged with fraud, false pretenses and using a computer to commit a crime since state police found no doctor who diagnosed cancer.

The charges were made as those who regularly helped Ylen reel from the news that the man who spent nearly 10 years in prison for her rape was released last year as newly discovered evidence cast doubt on whether she ever had been attacked.

“The fact that she's lived this long is a miracle. But maybe it wasn't a miracle after all. ... I'm just baffled. Is she the biggest con artist in the state of Michigan or the victim?” Connell said.

The fraud case isn't Ylen's only concern. In a neighboring county, she is charged with making a false report of rape just last year, even using makeup to imitate bruises.

Ylen and her attorney, Dave Heyboer, have not returned phone messages seeking comment. The Associated Press went to a Lexington address listed in court documents, but she no longer lives there.

The two cases against Ylen arise years since she first emerged in the public eye in the Port Huron area, 60 miles northeast of Detroit.

In 2002, Ylen told police she had been raped in broad daylight in a Meijer store parking lot more than a year earlier.

There was no surveillance video, physical evidence or witnesses. James Grissom, an off-duty Meijer employee with a past sex-related conviction, was charged when Ylen said her attacker, like Grissom, had a skull tattoo. He was found guilty in 2003 and sentenced to at least 15 years in prison, an enhanced punishment because Ylen said her attacker gave her a sexually transmitted disease.

Next, Ylen told her story to the Port Huron Times Herald. She said she wanted people to see her as a “victor,” not a “victim.” Readers inspired by “Sara's Story,” as the series was titled, started a fund to send her to community college.

But it didn't take long for Ylen's story to start unraveling. Authorities learned she claimed to have been kidnapped and raped while visiting her parents in Bakersfield, Calif., just months after the alleged parking lot attack back in Michigan. No charges were filed.

“My daughter likes to have a lot of attention,” her father, Dale Hill, told Bakersfield officers in a 2001 police report that was not uncovered until after Grissom's trial. Hill told the AP this week that he has not spoken to his daughter in years and didn't know anything about her recent claims.

After years of appeals, a judge in 2012 ruled that the police report could have changed the outcome of Grissom's trial and ordered a new one, saying Ylen appeared to have “concocted incredible stories” in California.

Prosecutors dropped the case without a second trial, and Grissom was freed in November.

As Grissom's appeals were moving through the courts, Ylen was telling people that she had developed cancer from a disease transmitted during the assault. She was back in the newspaper, supported by friends, including a state police sergeant, who believed she was on the verge of death in 2009.

Just about a year ago, Ylen was in a wheelchair at a Croswell Wesleyan Church auction and spaghetti dinner that raised $10,800.

“I thought I was doing something good for someone who had cancer. It's like a bad Lifetime movie,” said event organizer Sue Birtles.

Ylen's ex-husband, Jim, declined to comment on the criminal charges against his former wife, but divorce records indicate he had long doubted her tales of woe. The couple were married in 1993, separated in 2007 and divorced in 2011.

Psychologist Daniel Kachman evaluated Ylen as part of the divorce case and told the judge: “Often feeling dependent and dejected and fearful of rebuff, she may either withdraw from painful social relationships or decide to adapt the role of martyr.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.