1 SEAL dead, 7 injured in training crash at Kentucky fort
LOUISVILLE — A Navy SEAL was killed and seven others were injured when a Humvee overturned during a training exercise at Fort Knox in Kentucky, military officials said Friday.
Lt. David Lloyd, a spokesman for the Naval Special Warfare Group Two in Virginia Beach said the Humvee — carrying six SEALS and two sailors — was part of a post convoy Wednesday night.
The Navy said the SEAL who died was Special Warfare Operator Third Class Jonathan H. Kaloust, based at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek in Fort Story, Va. The seven survivors were treated for minor injuries. The cause is under investigation.
The sailors had been conducting tactical training, but Lloyd would not release further details about the exercise because it is considered sensitive.
Naval Special Warfare Group Two oversees a variety of operations, including reconnaissance and counterterrorism.
Kaloust, 23, of Massapequa, N.Y., joined the Navy in March 2011.
The Navy has used the 170-square-mile Fort Knox as a training ground since World War II.
The Army post is about 50 miles southwest of Louisville and is home to about 14,000 military personnel, including active-duty members and reserves.
Fort Knox has been used for training exercises, including the testing of ship mock-ups before the actual vessels are sent to combat zones.
The Army Corps of Engineers considers sections of the Salt River that fall within Fort Knox as danger zones. The river is used year-round for live fire exercises involving artillery, tanks, helicopters and other weapons.
There were five units and 247 sailors in training support at the post in 2011.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.