Boston will assess police response to bombings
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 7:15 p.m.
LOWELL, Mass. — Boston's police department and mayor's office will conduct twin reviews of the response to last month's bombing of the Boston Marathon, police commissioner Ed Davis said Saturday.
Davis said the aim of the reviews is to learn from the experience and prepare for the future.
“We are very anxious to get those reviews under way and learn lessons from anything that might pop up as an issue of concern,” Davis said. “I expect that this whole year will be a time of review and reflection on what happened.”
Davis addressed reporters after delivering the commencement address at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. The event occurred a little more than a month after the April 15 bombings that killed three people and wounded more than 260. The attacks made Davis a national figure.
He said one review, of all of the city's response services, will be conducted under the leadership of Mayor Thomas Menino and his office of Emergency Management. The second investigation will look at best practices and will be funded by the Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ohio geologists link quakes to fracking
- ‘Affluenza’ family won’t pay full rehab fee
- U.S. blocks choice by Iran for envoy to U.N.
- Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Scientists achieve cloning advance for use in treating diseases
- Obama administration delays decision on Keystone XL pipeline
- Grandmother left vengeful note in boys’ slayings, then committed suicide, police say
- Iranian envoy officially blocked by law
- Judge strikes down Minnesota’s anti-coal law as unconstitutional