Share This Page

'Anti-gay' shooting fatality stuns NYC

| Saturday, May 18, 2013, 7:12 p.m.

NEW YORK — A gunman used homophobic slurs before firing a fatal shot point-blank into a man's face on a Manhattan street alive with a weekend midnight crowd, a killing New York's police commissioner called an “anti-gay” hate crime.

Before opening fire early Saturday, the gunman confronted the victim and his companion in Greenwich Village and asked if they “want to die here,” Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said. The violence follows a series of recent bias attacks on gay men in New York, but this was the first deadly one.

At a news conference, Kelly described the events leading to the violence that erupted in a lively social scene a few blocks from Washington Square Park and New York University:

Late Friday night, about 15 minutes before the shooting, the gunman was seen urinating on a street outside a bar blocks from the Stonewall Inn, a birthplace of the gay rights movement.

He then entered, asking the bartender whether he would call the police after having seen what is normally an act warranting only a summons.

He told both the bartender and the manager, “if you do call the police, I'll shoot you.” The man then opened his gray hooded sweatshirt to reveal a shoulder holster with a revolver.

The silver gun was used minutes later in the killing, the commissioner said.

While in the bar, the gunman also made anti-gay remarks, Kelly said.

“This fully looks to be a hate crime, a bias crime,” Kelly concluded.

Police identified the victim as Harlem resident Marc Carson.

Kelly said authorities did not immediately know the name of the suspect because he was using a false identity. The weapon believed used in the shooting — a Taurus .38-caliber six-shot revolver — was recovered.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.