House GOP undeterred by rulings on abortion
WASHINGTON — House Republicans who oppose abortion promoted legislation on Wednesday that would ban the procedure after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
These Republicans want to move ahead despite recent court decisions that have struck down similar state laws. The GOP lawmakers are taking on their own leadership, which has shown little desire to hold votes on contentious social issues.
Arizona Rep. Trent Franks, joined by 10 other Republicans and anti-abortion advocates at a news conference, said there was a “good chance” that his bill would be floated in the full House this year.
Franks and others said the legislation would gain momentum from the recent conviction of a Philadelphia abortion provider, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, for killing three babies born alive in his clinic.
In the four decades that abortion has been legal in the United States, “many, until Gosnell, somehow construed abortion as victimless. That has changed,” said Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J.
Franks' bill, which originally would have imposed the 20-week ban only in the District of Columbia, was expanded after the Gosnell case.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. clears police officer in Ferguson case, criticizes police force
- Md. man accused in 5 random shootings
- Winter storm swirls from Texas to New England
- Ferguson’s white officer justified in shooting black man, feds find
- Mogul donates $100M to Lincoln Center
- NYC public schools to close on 2 major Muslim holidays
- Inside job suspected in robbery of gold bars from truck
- Alabama Supreme Court defies federal judge’s ruling
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Tsarnaev’s lawyer admits he carried out Boston bombing
- Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules