NYC man abducted, burned with acid
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, May 23, 2013, 8:03 p.m.
NEW YORK — A businessman was snatched from a New York City street in broad daylight, then held captive for more than a month in a warehouse where he was bound and burned with acid as he was held for a $3 million ransom his family back in Ecuador did not have, authorities said.
Pedro Portugal, 52, was found this week by detectives who had been monitoring calls, noticed pizza deliveries to a deserted area in Queens and zeroed in on the warehouse, police said. Three men were arrested and charged with kidnapping and unlawful imprisonment. One is still believed to be at large in the United States, and three fled to Ecuador, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said on Thursday.
Portugal, a father of six who owned a small accounting and tax firm in Queens, was burned with acid and spent the better part of a month with his head cloaked, authorities said. He remained hospitalized
Police said he was approached by three captors on April 18. He was forced into an SUV at knifepoint. His mother in Quito, Ecuador, got a call from a man calling himself “Tito” and demanding a $3 million ransom, police said.
Kelly said the family had some property — but nowhere near enough cash to come up with the ransom.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- Nuke plant safety improving, watchdog says — with cautions
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Spyware in government computers ‘has Russian paw prints all over it’
- Accuser takes stand during court-martial
- Miranda read to sex assault accuser, 14
- Border Patrol ordered to stop shooting at vehicles
- Economists explain why Fed’s taper could spark market meltdown
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Kansas public school funding unconstitutional
- Deputy accused of illegal stops