Share This Page

Anti-war activist heckles Obama over Gitmo

| Thursday, May 23, 2013, 8:27 p.m.

President Obama had a run-in with a heckler on Thursday when a founder of the anti-war group Code Pink interrupted a speech on drone policy and other national security issues.

Near the end of Obama's address at the National Defense University, a woman identified as longtime activist Medea Benjamin implored the president to close the Guantanamo Bay prison. The president traded words with Benjamin, asking her to let him finish.

“Why don't you sit down, and I will tell you exactly what I'm going to do,” Obama said, ending their first exchange. “Thank you, ma'am.”

But soon, Benjamin was back, apparently not happy with Obama's comments about sending detainees to other countries and pleading with him to “release them today.”

“I'm willing to cut the young lady who interrupted me some slack, because it's worth being passionate about,” Obama responded. “Is this who we are? Is that something our founders foresaw?”

Soon she spoke up again.

“You are commander in chief! You can close Guantanamo today!” Benjamin shouted. “You can release those 86 prisoners!”

“It's been 11 years!” she said.

“Let me finish,” Obama pleaded.

“I love my country. I love the rule of law!” she said as she was removed by security officers.

Obama then tried to lighten the situation and repeated that Benjamin deserved to be heard.

“I'm going off-script, as you might have expected,” he said with a laugh. “The voice of that woman is worth paying attention to. Obviously, I do not agree with much of what she said, and obviously she wasn't listening to me and much of what I said. But these are tough issues, and the suggestion that we can gloss over them is wrong.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.