Senator says commanders allowing sex assaults in military should be fired
By The Associated Press
Published: Sunday, May 26, 2013, 7:00 p.m.
WASHINGTON — From Congress to the White House, pressure is mounting to hold military commanders accountable for the rising number of sexual assaults in the armed services.
“This needs to end,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and a member of the Armed Services Committee, said on Sunday. “When a victim comes forward, they should have an advocate to walk them through the military justice system, and commanders who allow this, to continue to allow this to flourish, quite frankly should be fired.”
Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said the military's future includes men and women in leadership, and cultural changes are needed “when it comes to the command structure.”
But the military's top officer, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, is urging Congress to exercise caution in crafting legislation to combat what is considered an epidemic of sex assaults in the armed forces.
The Pentagon released a report this month estimating that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year and that thousands are unwilling to come forward despite new oversight and assistance. That figure compares with 19,000 estimated assaults in 2011.
Retired Gen. John Allen, who left the Marines after commanding forces in Afghanistan, encouraged commanders to tell subordinates exactly what was expected of them.
“Commanders can't be ambiguous about this. We can't not talk about that,” Allen said on Sunday. “Commanders (have) got to stand in front of their units and tell the people what they expect. Because silence isn't good enough. This is an opportunity to lead, and we should be seizing it.”
Several recent arrests have added to the military's embarrassment. A soldier at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point was charged with secretly photographing women, including in a bathroom. The Air Force officer who led the service's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response unit was arrested on charges of groping a woman. And the manager of the Army's sexual assault response program at Fort Campbell, Ky., was relieved of his post after his arrest in a domestic dispute with his ex-wife.
The comments from Durbin, Graham and Allen capped a week of attempts to address the Pentagon's findings. President Obama and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel raised the issue separately in graduation speeches at the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis and the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.
“Those who commit sexual assault are not only committing a crime; they threaten the trust and discipline that makes our military strong,” Obama said Friday. “That's why we have to be determined to stop these crimes, because they've got no place in the greatest military on Earth.”
Hagel called on the graduating West Point cadets Saturday to use their leadership to address the epidemic.
“This scourge must be stamped out,” Hagel said. “We are all accountable and responsible for ensuring that this happens. We cannot fail the Army or America. We cannot fail each other, and we cannot fail the men and women that we lead.”
Members of a House panel on Wednesday approved legislation that would strip commanding officers of their longstanding authority to unilaterally change or dismiss court-martial convictions in rape and assault cases. The bill would also require that service members found guilty of sexual offenses be dismissed or dishonorably discharged. The legislation will be folded into a broader defense policy bill that the full House will consider in the coming weeks.
Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has acknowledged the severity of the problem. He said recently that military leaders are losing the confidence of the women who serve that they can come up with solutions.
But Dempsey said in a May 20 letter to the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee that any legislative remedies must maintain the commander's role in the military justice process. Cutting them out or limiting them too severely would undercut their authority to enforce discipline and execute their duties, he wrote.
“Good order and discipline is essential to military efficiency and effectiveness,” Dempsey said in the letter to Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. “Removing commanders from the military justice process sends the message to everyone in the military that there is a lack of faith in the officer corps and the serving commanders. Conveyance of a message that commanders cannot be trusted will only serve to undermine good order and discipline.”
Dempsey and the chiefs of the military services are scheduled to testify June 4 before the Senate Armed Services Committee on legislation to prevent sexual assaults.
Sharon Disher graduated from the Naval Academy in 1980 in the first class that included women. She said Friday she's disappointed the military is still grappling with sexual assault issues but applauded the president for raising the subject.
“The more we talk about it, the more we're going to do something about it, and that's the thing we never did,” she said. “I guess we've just got to keep the conversation going until we fix the problem.”
Durbin and Graham spoke on “Fox News Sunday.” Allen appeared on ABC's “This Week.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Plane crash kills Hawaii official in Obama’s ‘birther’ fuss
- Colo. boy, 6, no longer guilty of ‘sexual harassment’
- Geminid meteor shower takes the stage
- Longtime intel adviser resigns as feds learn of link to China tech company
- Snowstorm silences north Texas
- Survivors honor Pearl Harbor’s heroes
- U.S. apple growers eye open trade with China
- Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky promises new GOP on way
- Obama puts odds of nuclear deal at 50-50
- Car hits deer, which flies into jogger
- Cold snap ices roads, cuts power to thousands