Pre-built bridges to be trucked to Interstate 5 collapse site in Washington state
SEATTLE — Temporary spans will be installed across the Skagit River in northern Washington state where an Interstate 5 span collapsed into the water last week, Gov. Jay Inslee announced Sunday.
Inslee said he hopes the temporary spans, each with two lanes for northbound and southbound traffic, will be finished in about three weeks or about mid-June.
The spans will be pre-built and trucked to Mount Vernon, Wash., where the collapse happened.
The state plan also calls for a permanent span to be built at the same time with crews rolling in the permanent fix by autumn, officials said.
“We're going to get this project done as fast as humanly possible,” Inslee said. “There are no more important issues right now to the economy of the state of Washington than getting this bridge up and running.”
Officials say there are remaining inspections to the spans left standing to make sure they are safe to use.
The federal government is expected to cover 100 percent of the costs of the temporary bridge and 90 percent of the replacement, said state Transportation Secretary Lynn Peterson.
The temporary span would be able to carry regular-sized cargos as well as cars. The speed limit would be lower than the 60 mph allowed previously.
On Thursday, a semi-truck carrying an oversize load clipped a steel truss, starting the collapse of the span and sending cars and people into the cold river, authorities said. The three people in the cars survived with non-life-threatening injuries.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Boys in New York buried for hours in snow pile
- Sunlight reduces risk of nearsightedness in children, study suggests
- FBI uses journalists as bait for terrorists, escapee from Syrian group says
- Bombers to train over Plains
- Homeless woman’s stun gun spurs 2nd Amendment case
- Texan who targeted Mexican consulate in Austin killed in shootout with police
- Ferguson-related unrest disrupts Black Friday shopping in several cities
- Maine State Prison draws Black Friday shoppers
- Fissures begin to emerge among Dems
- With no indictment, chaos fills Ferguson streets
- Feds put brakes on green energy edict of renewable fuel standard