ShareThis Page

Holder loses favor in polls; 42% say he should resign

| Saturday, June 1, 2013, 5:48 p.m.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder said that a serious national security leak required the secret gathering of telephone records at The Associated Press.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, May 15, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder said that a serious national security leak required the secret gathering of telephone records at The Associated Press.

President Obama is dipping in public opinion polls, no surprise given the string of scandals — or at least P.R. problems — he's been having lately.

One of those political problems is his attorney general, who's doing even worse in the polls.

Just 25 percent of likely voters have a favorable opinion of Attorney General Eric Holder, while 47 percent view him unfavorably, according to a Rasmussen Reports poll out Friday. Asked whether he should resign, a 42 percent plurality says “yes.”

Republicans have been calling for Holder's head since last year when the “fast and furious” gun-tracking fiasco was revealed, and the more recent secret tracking of journalists' phone records has revived those calls.

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement that Holder “has trampled on the First Amendment and failed in his sworn duty to uphold the Constitution,” and as a result “the president should ask for his immediate resignation.”

Sen. Ted Cruz, Rep. Bob Goodlatte and other lawmakers are among those in Congress saying it's time for Holder to go.

But calls for Holder's resignation are coming from the left as well, and that has to be more troubling to the White House.

“The attorney general has done little in his tenure to protect civil liberties or the free press,” writes George Washington University law professor Jonathon Turley, who describes himself as “neither a Republican nor conservative.”

“Rather, Holder has supervised a comprehensive erosion of privacy rights, press freedom and due process,” Turley writes in a USA Today column. “I believe Holder should be fired.”

Matthew Rothschild, editor of The Progressive magazine, has called for Holder's resignation as well.

In an interview on Democracy Now! Rothschild listed several reasons: Justice Department probes of Associated Press writers and editors and James Rosen of Fox News, “essentially waging war on whistle-blowers under the Espionage Act,” and providing the legal justification for what critics see as an assassination program using drone aircraft.

“That's not due process, and that's not what the Justice Department should be doing,” Rothschild said. “Certainly the attorney general, the chief law enforcement officer of this country, should know better than that.”

James Goodale, a First Amendment lawyer who was chief counsel for the New York Times during the Pentagon Papers, said Holder should resign for his role in the James Rosen case.

“He signed off on a search warrant to Rosen, a Fox News reporter,” Goodale writes in the Daily Beast. “This warrant treated Rosen as a common criminal. It sets a terrible precedent. Holder should resign to erase this precedent.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.