Chasm remains between Dems, Republicans over debt
By The Washington Post
Published: Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 5:42 p.m.
WASHINGTON — How big is the nation's borrowing problem? Is it the $6.3 trillion in fresh debt projected during the next decade? Or is it the more than $70 trillion that Republicans say the nation will rack up during the next 30 years?
Under Option 1, the national debt is high but stable as a share of the nation's overall economy. Under Option 2, the debt is exploding to unheard of levels.
The difference helps explain one of the most fundamental disagreements between the parties as budget talks lurch into their third consecutive year on Capitol Hill: Democrats, looking at the short term, have declared the nation's debt problem all but solved. Republicans, looking at the long term, are demanding huge cuts in spending.
In recent days, Republicans have sought to sharpen their point in the dispute, arguing in meetings with top White House officials that the 30-year “window” offers a clearer view of the challenges ahead.
“You need to attack the 30-year problem,” said Sen. Ronald H. Johnson of Wisconsin, one of more than a dozen GOP senators involved in the meetings. “The budget problem we're facing is really about the demographic one, spanning the baby boom generation.”
He added: “As we move into retirement until, I hate to say it, the end of our lives, we've got promises made to that generation that are going to be very difficult for this government to keep. Unless you're willing to look at that honestly, unless you're willing to tell the American people the truth, I don't see how you can start solving the problem.”
Democrats are practically rolling their eyes, dismissing the argument as another stall tactic to avoid addressing the most immediate budget issue: what to do about the sharp automatic cuts known as the sequester.
“I'm happy to talk about Medicare 30 years down the road,” said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray, D-Wash. “But we can't put all the what-ifs on the table right now and say we're not going to take care of the horrific impacts of sequestration because we're busy figuring out everything that's going to happen in the next three decades.”
The sequester is slicing about $40 billion out of agency spending this year. That figure will more than double in the fiscal year that begins in October, slowing economic growth in the coming calendar year by 0.7 percentage points, according to independent estimates.
Republicans want to keep the sequester cuts but exempt the Pentagon. President Obama wants to replace most of the cuts for all agencies with higher taxes on the rich and long-term reforms to Social Security and Medicare that would save $1.8 trillion during the next decade and, some Republicans acknowledge, even more over the next 30 years.
But other Republicans have rejected Obama's approach because it involves higher taxes. Unless the two sides can reach an agreement, the government will shut down Oct. 1, and the Treasury Department will face a potential default before the year is out.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama hams it up for health care on Funny or Die
- Deaths from heroin, pain pills called ‘urgent,’ growing’ crisis
- Snowden captivates tech crowd
- Lanza’s father says he wishes son was never born
- Senate OKs bill scrapping ‘good soldier defense’
- General’s court-martial is thrown into jeopardy
- D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal ‘shadow campaign’
- Fannie, Freddie profits surprise
- Depth, distance reduce impact of quake off California’s northern coast
- Changes to Medicare drug coverage scrapped
- White House advises teaching students about money