Immigration bill survives challenge in Senate
WASHINGTON — A landmark immigration bill survived a major challenge on Thursday in the Senate when its bipartisan “Gang of Eight” sponsors beat back an amendment that would have delayed a pathway to citizenship for 11 million illegal residents.
The proposal by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, would have prohibited a first step toward granting them legal status for six months until the Department of Homeland Security “has maintained effective control” of the entire U.S.-Mexico border — 1,969 miles.
Critics charged the proposal could take years to achieve such a nebulous goal, undermining a centerpiece of the effort to overhaul the immigration system.
The Senate “Gang of Eight” bill would allow those living in the United States illegally to apply for legal status within six months if the bill becomes law.
The vote on the Grassley amendment was the first test of unity and clout in the full Senate for the Gang of Eight — four Democrats and four Republicans — as they protected what they see as a pillar of their measure — a provision to make undocumented immigrants legal residents quickly.
Grassley said the defeat of his amendment, 57-43, broke a promise by President Obama's Democrats to permit an “open debate.” Democrats forced a vote after little discussion.
“This type of obstruction is the wrong way to start the amendment process,” said Grassley, who argued that his amendment would ensure there is “true border security before legalization, and that's what the people of this country want.”
Polls show public support for the Senate bill, including the pathway to citizenship.
House Republicans, meanwhile, touted a tough new law-and-order bill aimed at illegal immigrants — a sign that at least for now, the conservative wing of the party is driving the immigration debate in that chamber.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte called the legislation “game-changing” with its provisions giving state and local police departments powers to apprehend undocumented people.
Democrats called the bill a step backward if it leads to racial profiling by local police.
“It's alarming that this bill would turn millions of undocumented immigrants into criminals overnight. It's not only terrible politics but its inhumane policy,” said Rep. John Conyers of Michigan.
, the senior Democrat on the committee.
Meanwhile, five Senate Democrats met with Obama to discuss strategy, including how to meet Republican demands to bolster border security. Afterward, one aide said the president and senators “discussed a path forward in the Senate and strategy for the next two weeks.”
The five include the four Democrats in the Gang of Eight — Dick Durbin of Illinois, Charles Schumer of New York, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, who shepherded the bill through his panel last month and is now charged with getting it through the full Senate, also attended. Following the meeting, Leahy predicted the measure would pass the Senate before July 4.
Separately, another group of senators quietly sought to negotiate a deal to toughen border security without offending the coalition of senators now supporting the bill.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who is part of the Group of Eight, said he was uncertain if progress had been made.
“We have to get a certain number of people that would agree to a plan that we could achieve 90 percent effective control of the border,” McCain said. “We think it's possible but I'm not predicting. Technology is one of the ways we get there.”
Assistant Senate Republican Leader John Cornyn of Texas, who has an amendment of his own that seeks 90 percent “effective border control” before any legalization of undocumented workers, said he had seen no progress in finding a compromise.
But Cornyn added, “I'm happy to listen and in the process, talk to my colleagues.”
Backers of the nearly 900-page bill are aiming for a vote on passage by the end of this month, confident it will prevail. The Republican-led House of Representatives is expected to produce different legislation in coming weeks, which would have to be reconciled with anything the Senate passes.
Polls show public support for the Senate bill, including the pathway to U.S. citizenship. Debate on the legislation is expected to last the rest of the month.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Overhaul of military benefit programs sought
- Judge orders nonprofit tax form release in case against IRS
- Senators approve Keystone pipeline
- Taliban 5 linking with Haqqani, Graham says
- Poll shows giant gap between what public, scientists think
- San Francisco blaze kills Mission District resident
- Rock pythons creep into Everglades
- Homeland chief says cuts over immigration puts U.S. at risk
- Obama calls for government spending surge
- Police in South Carolina: Family killed man in custody fight
- Former Idaho National Guard soldier’s benefits claims yield indictment