Fight for gun control not over, Biden says
WASHINGTON — Vice President Joe Biden said on Tuesday that the Obama administration will continue fighting for a “rational gun policy” — more than six months after the Dec. 14 shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., and two months after a major reversal in Congress.
“The president and I — our team — have not given up,” Biden said in remarks at the White House.
Biden spoke hours after the White House released a report, saying it has “completed or made significant progress” on 21 of 23 executive actions that Obama outlined on Jan. 16 in a major gun-control initiative.
“We need Congress to act,” he said.
The Senate blocked a background check bill in April, mostly because of Republicans' votes. Obama administration officials and Senate Democrats are trying to revive the bill by pressuring senators who voted against it to reconsider.
Biden said the background-check bill had majority support in the Senate but ran afoul of filibuster rules that require “60 votes for everything.” He said some senators who voted to block a debate now wonder if that was “a prudent vote.”
Although not specifying anyone, Biden said some senators have had their approval ratings drop since their opposition to the gun vote in April.
Gun control opponents say the proposals are ineffective and undermine the Second Amendment rights to gun ownership.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects Jewish House Democrats’ invitation
- Alabama woman set for trial in granddaughter’s running death