ShareThis Page

NSA chief: Snooping uncovered 50 terror 'events'

| Tuesday, June 18, 2013, 9:42 p.m.
National Security Agency Director Gen. Keith B. Alexander, second from right, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 18, 2013, before the House Intelligence Committee. Amid revelations that the electronic surveillance agency is sweeping up Americans' phone and Internet records in its quest to investigate terrorist threats, President Barack Obama defended top secret National Security Agency spying programs as legal during an interview yesterday, and called them transparent even though they are authorized in secret. From right to left are, Deputy FBI Director Sean Joyce, Alexander, Deputy NSA Director Chris Inglis, and Deputy Attorney General James Cole.

WASHINGTON — The director of the National Security Agency testified on Tuesday that the government's surveillance program helped thwart more than 50 terrorist “events” worldwide since 9/11, including a planned bombing of the New York Stock Exchange.

Army Gen. Keith Alexander, the NSA's director, made the revelation during a rare open session of the House's Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Alexander was called by panel members to defend and explain government cyber-snooping, which officials contend has been misunderstood since it was revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Alexander, along with representatives of the FBI, the Office of National Intelligence and the Justice Department, tried to quell public angst over the size and scope of the government's telephone and Internet surveillance activities following reports in Britain's Guardian newspaper and The Washington Post based on Snowden's leaks.

“This is not a program that's off the books, that's been hidden away,” Deputy Attorney General James Cole told lawmakers. “It's been overseen by three branches of our government: the legislature, the judiciary and the executive branch.”

Alexander told the committee that the programs were instrumental in preventing about 50 terrorist “events” in more than 20 countries.

At least “10 of these events included homeland-based threats,” he added.

The NSA director said he would provide House and Senate lawmakers detailed information on the 50 events in a classified setting. However, Sean Joyce, deputy director of the FBI, divulged some recently declassified information about two foiled domestic plots.

Without going into great detail, Joyce said authorities were able to stop a plot to bomb the New York Stock Exchange before it fully hatched because federal authorities, through the surveillance programs, were monitoring “an extremist in Yemen” who was “talking with an individual located in the United States in Kansas City, Missouri.”

The individual was later identified as Khalid Ouazzani. The Kansas City Star reported in June that Ouazzani, a businessman, was part of a small terror cell with two New York men. He pleaded guilty in May 2010 to providing material support to a terrorist organization, admitting that he sent more than $23,000 to al-Qaida and performed “other tasks” for the group.

Starting in 2007, Ouazzani gave money to al-Qaida through Sabirhan Hasanoff of Brooklyn. Another man, Wesam El-Hanafi, accepted Ouazzani's oath of allegiance to al-Qaida, according to federal court records that identified Ouazzani as “CC-1.”

Court records showed that the three men met in Brooklyn in May 2008 to discuss al-Qaida membership. According to the court records, Hasanoff advised Ouazzani not to let his U.S. passport become filled with immigration stamps in order to retain its value to al-Qaida. Ouazzani also contacted a consulate in New York after speaking with the other men, The Star reported.

In announcing charges against Hasanoff and El-Hanafi in April 2010, federal prosecutors said the pair had conspired to modernize al-Qaida by updating its computer systems, which included buying a software program that helped “communicate securely with others over the Internet,” The Star reported.

When Ouazzani was identified, Joyce told the intelligence committee members, “We went up on electronic surveillance and identified his co-conspirators.

“And this was the plot that was in the very initial stages of plotting to bomb the New York Stock Exchange,” he said. “We were able to disrupt the plot, we were able to lure some individuals to the United States, and we were able to effect their arrest. And they were convicted for this terrorist activity.”

Ouazzani's lawyer said his client had no knowledge or role in that plot.

“Khalid Ouazzani had nothing to do with any plot to blow up the New York Stock Exchange,” said Robin Fowler, who declined further comment.

In the second declassified plot, Joyce said, federal authorities were able to identify a San Diego man who intended to financially support a terrorism group in Somalia.

Joyce said the FBI investigated the man shortly after 9/11, but they didn't find any connection to terrorist activity.

“Several years later, the NSA provided us a telephone number only in San Diego that had indirect contact with an extremist outside the United States,” Joyce said.

With further electronic surveillance, approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Joyce said, the FBI was able to identify the man's co-conspirators “and we were able to disrupt this terrorist activity.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.