NPR's new digs derided as costly 'News Palace'
NPR's gleaming new headquarters in the shadow of the Capitol in Washington has soaring ceilings, a 24-hour “wellness” center, an employee gym and a gourmet cafe staffed by a resident chef. This could be a political problem.
NPR showed off the 400,000-square-foot complex to members of the media this week. It immediately began drawing some grumbles from those who see the edifice as far too luxe for a nonprofit radio and digital-news organization that depends, in part, on taxpayer support.
The rumblings began when the Drudge Report linked to a rather innocuous account of the news-media tour. Soon, the blogosphere was percolating with denunciations of the building's cost and alleged excesses.
“They build a ‘News Palace' and they still need taxpayer dollars?!?” tweeted Jim Farley, vice president of news for WTOP, the all-news radio station in Washington.
A blogger known as the Lonely Conservative sniped, “Who wouldn't be jealous of working in such a lavish space, especially when one's tax dollars help to fund” it?
And Michael Savage, the conservative radio host, asked, “How much money did that cost to build?”
Answer: $201 million, or a bit more than NPR's annual operating budget of $174.7 million in fiscal 2013.
NPR officials point out the new headquarters wasn't financed with tax dollars, at least not directly. The organization raised funds through a combination of tax-free bonds, individual donations and the proceeds from the sale of its old building.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Coal’s worst fears affirmed in analysis of Obama climate plan
- Suspect in killings of wealthy D.C. family arrested
- Dogs split from the wolf pack earlier than thought, DNA analysis suggests
- Obama trade bill advances in Senate
- Ex-Va. lawmaker plans to wed teen in sex scandal
- LA raises minimum wage to $15 an hour
- Suspect in killings of wealthy DC family arrested
- 4 dead in Atlanta interstate plane crash
- 38 Cuban migrants remain on U.S. ship
- Decisions of federal judges worry coal mining industry
- 5 big banks plead guilty to currency manipulation