Girl Scouts hounded by dissension , fiscal woes
Given the friction and financial woes facing the Girl Scouts these days, perhaps it's time for a giant friendship circle. Under that long-standing tradition, a ring of Scouts clasp hands and give a little squeeze, accompanied by a silent wish of good will.
Just a year after its centennial celebrations, the Girl Scouts of the USA finds itself in a different sort of squeeze. Its interconnected problems include declining membership and revenues, a dearth of volunteers, rifts between leadership and grass-roots members, a pension plan with a $347 million deficit, and an uproar over efforts by many local councils to sell venerable summer camps.
The tangle of difficulties has prompted one congressman to request an inquiry by the House Ways and Means Committee into the pension liabilities and the sale of camps.
“I am worried that America's Girl Scouts are now selling cookies to fund pension plans instead of camping,” wrote Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, in a letter last month to the committee chairman.
Compounding the problems are tensions at GSUSA headquarters in New York, where several senior executives have quit or been ousted since Anna Maria Chavez took over as CEO in 2011. Last week, some of the approximately 325 employees there were invited to take early retirement, and Chavez said an unspecified number of layoffs are expected in August.
Chavez insists the GSUSA is on the right track, although she acknowledged that sweeping changes in structure and programs during the past 10 years have been difficult for many in the Scouts' extended family.
“Change can be unsettling and it is not surprising that some would prefer for us to remain static,” she said. “But doing so would be a disservice to girls who need us now more than ever.”
Indeed, there's a common denominator between the GSUSA leaders and their critics — earnest expressions of devotion to the Girl Scouts and fervent hopes that it manages to thrive.
“I care so much about this organization, and that's why I hate to see it pulled down,” said Suellen Nelles, CEO of a local council based in Fairbanks, Alaska. “We have leadership at the top who are toxic to this organization and need to go.”
Connie Lindsey, the president of GSUSA's governing board, said the board had confidence in Chavez.
“Our board supports our CEO,” said Lindsey, a corporate executive from Chicago. “We know it's a difficult charge we've given her.”
Programs, image dated
Since 2003, the Girl Scouts has undergone a thorough transformation aimed at making its programs and image more relevant to a diverse population of girls. Changes have affected uniforms, handbooks, program materials, even the logo and the fine print on the boxes of Girl Scout cookies.
“Our brand, as iconic as it is, was misunderstood — it was dated,” Chavez said in an interview on Friday in her Manhattan office.
Yet today the Girl Scouts has about 2.2 million youth members, down from more than 2.8 million in 2003. Donations to the national office and local councils plunged to $104 million in 2011 from nearly $148 million in 2007.
The biggest change — implemented from 2006 to 2009 by Chavez' predecessor, Kathy Cloninger — was a realignment that slashed the number of local councils from 312 to 112. It was intended to increase efficiency, but resulted in the departure of many longtime employees and volunteers.
A handful of councils resisted. One of them, the Manitou Council based in Sheboygan, Wis., sued to block its merger in 2008 after negotiations failed to resolve its concerns.
The council argued that it deserved the same protections as a for-profit franchise operator, and in 2011 the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.
“From a commercial standpoint, the Girl Scouts are not readily distinguishable from Dunkin' Donuts,” the court wrote in its opinion.
Also refusing to merge was the Farthest North Girl Scout Council in Fairbanks, led by Nelles. She says she's been ostracized by the national office.
“Questioning authority is very much frowned upon,” she said. “If anyone resisted them at any point, they said we just wanted to hold on to the past.”
From surplus to deficit
Among other consequences, the mergers affected the Girl Scouts' national pension plan, because many employees were added to it as an inducement to take early retirement.
One council, the Nashville-based Girl Scouts of Middle Tennessee, is suing to get out of the pension plan. The lawsuit contends the GSUSA added as many as 1,850 employees to the plan who hadn't contributed to it, leaving local councils with an unplanned-for liability.
The suit says the pension plan had a surplus of more than $150 million in 2007. It now has a deficit of about $347 million, according to GSUSA figures.
The GSUSA has filed a motion for the case to be dismissed.
It also is asking Congress to pass legislation that would provide relief by stretching out the timetable for local councils to pay into the pension plan. Without such relief, councils could face a 40 percent increase in pension expenses next year, and be forced into layoffs and program cuts, according to GSUSA.
Financial stress has prompted many councils to consider selling off old summer camps, both to gain revenue and reduce maintenance costs.
In many states — including Iowa, Ohio, New York, Alabama and Missouri — the sell-off plans provoked intense debate. Pro-camp activists argue that camping is integral to the Girl Scout experience; local leaders contend that today's girls are less keen on camping than their predecessors.
“Camps will always be part of our mission,” Chavez said. “But girls aren't living in the past — they're living in the future.”
Hispanic Scouts increase
Chavez, 45, took over as the GSUSA's first Hispanic CEO after serving as chief executive of Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas. She's pleased by a 55 percent surge in the number of Hispanic Girl Scouts since 2000.
Under her leadership, a new set of handbooks seeks to nurture such attributes as environmental awareness, healthy lifestyles and critical thinking. New programs seek to boost girls' competency with money matters and encourage them to pursue careers in science and technology. In the fiscal realm, GSUSA has begun a campaign to raise $1 billion by 2017.
GSUSA Treasurer Joan Wagnon reported in March that revenue from membership dues was down 3.8 percent the past year and nationwide cookie sales for 2012-13 were down about 4.5 percent.
The national headquarters' operating budget relies heavily on efforts of the local councils, notably the $12 annual dues (rising to $15 later this year) paid by individual Girl Scouts plus revenue from sales of uniforms and merchandise.
The Girl Scouts note that many youth organizations have been losing members, for a variety of reasons. The Boy Scouts youth membership declined from 3.3 million in 2002 to about 2.6 million last year.
Some critics say the recent program changes have gone overboard in de-emphasizing traditional outdoor activities and replacing them with curricula that replicates schoolwork.
“In trying to be more relevant, they've gone too far the other way,” said Cheryl Brown, former CEO of a Girl Scout council in Arkansas. She left the post in 2009, soon after her council was forced to merge with four others.
Brown also said pressure from headquarters to boost membership led some councils to recruit girls with no intention of engaging them in the full scope of Girl Scout activities.
“It no longer was about the girls — it was about the money,” she said.
Nationwide, the shortage of volunteers is a critical problem, according to Chavez, who wants to develop new recruiting strategies.
“At the end of the day, we're not serving enough girls,” she said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Huge, ancient quasar could alter theories on black holes
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- Hackers won’t take break if DHS shuts down, officials warn
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Senate GOP bill splits funding Department of Homeland Security, Obama’s immigration actions