Bullied bus monitor stays 'regular old lady'
GREECE, N.Y. — No new carpet or furniture for the home she's lived in for 46 years. No fancy car in the driveway.
After being gifted a life-changing sum after a school bus bullying episode seen around the world a year ago, former bus monitor Karen Klein says she really hasn't changed all that much.
Sure, the “Today” show mug she drinks coffee from reminds her of the widespread media attention her story brought, and the occasional stranger wants to snap her picture.
She's also retired, something the 69-year-old widow couldn't afford before.
But Klein, who drove a school bus for 20 years before spending three years as a monitor, remains as unassuming as she was before learning how the kindness of strangers can trump the cruelty of four adolescent boys.
“It's really amazing,” Klein said at her suburban Rochester home, still perplexed at the outpouring unleashed by a 10-minute cellphone video of her being ridiculed. The video, recorded by a student, was posted online.
When 25-year-old Canadian Max Sidorov was moved to take up an online collection to send her on vacation, more than 32,000 people from 84 countries responded — pledging $703,873 in donations.
“It's just the way it hits them, I guess. I don't know. I don't know,” Klein said, still unsure of why it all happened.
Sidorov has called it “ridiculously more than I expected.”
Klein used $100,000 as seed money for the Karen Klein Anti-Bullying Foundation, which has promoted its message of kindness at concerts and through books. “There's a lot I wish I could be doing, but I don't know how to do it,” Klein said. “I'm just a regular old lady,” she added with a laugh.
She has spent some helping family members and friends, and “the rest is under lock and key” for retirement, and maybe a motor home.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reagan shooter Hinckley closer to permanent freedom
- GOP invokes Benghazi, Obama in ripping Clinton
- Ohio woman finds mother, sister — at work
- FBI unit supplied flawed forensics
- ‘Dr. Oz’ to counter criticisms on air
- Public access to police body cam videos assailed
- Keystone pipeline project gains favor among nearby liberals, study shows
- Holdup of AG vote cast as issue of race
- Dementia patients’ rights considered
- Federal appeals court appears divided on Obama’s immigrant deportation shield
- New York City rent increases oust small retailers