Immigration bill gets Rubio's OK
WASHINGTON — Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, shifting his tone on the immigration bill he helped to write, said on Tuesday he is now fully satisfied that the measure will do what it takes to secure the southern border with Mexico.
Rubio, a potential presidential contender and the most high-profile Republican backer of immigration reform, had irked supporters of the Senate immigration bill with public comments in which he consistently said the legislation was not tough enough on border enforcement.
The Florida lawmaker was part of the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” senators that in April announced the bill that would provide a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants while beefing up border security and starting guest worker programs for high- and low-skilled workers.
The Senate measure appears headed for passage this week, with supporters expecting a strong showing of about 70 votes in favor of it. An amendment on border security crafted by a small group of Republicans has helped to persuade several in the party to give their backing to the bill.
At a cost of $46 billion, the amendment would double the number of agents on the southern border to about 40,000 and provide more high-tech surveillance equipment.
“This amendment basically now puts into place virtually everything people have been asking me to do about immigration enforcement since I began talking about this issue,” Rubio told a convention of the American Society of News Editors. “I think we've run out of things we can to do to support — to improve the border.”
In a series of television and radio interviews during the past two months, Rubio had said he did not think the bill could get a sufficient number of Republican votes needed for passage without stronger border language and that his own vote depended on such changes.
Alex Conant, a spokesman for Rubio, said that while the senator is now satisfied with the border language in the bill, he still wants votes on some other changes, including an amendment under discussion that would further bolster the system employers use to verify workers' legal status.
Passage of the immigration bill in the Democrat-led Senate would send the measure to the Republican-dominated House of Representatives, where it faces a much tougher sell. Many conservatives have denounced the plans to give legal status to the undocumented as “amnesty.”
Asked about House Speaker John Boehner's strategy for handling the immigration issue in that chamber, Rubio said it is up to House lawmakers to determine the course they want to take.
But he added: “I think we have a good piece of legislation they should take a look at. There are a lot of good ideas that they should adopt.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Case on Obamacare tax subsidies heads to Supreme Court
- Obama promises to veto Republican vote to reverse NLRB rule on unions
- Railroad measure awaits House approval
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- $4.8M in gold taken in armored truck hijacking in North Carolina
- Maryland’s Senator Mikulski announces retirement
- Petraeus, Justice Department reach plea deal on secret info given to mistress
- Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects Jewish House Democrats’ invitation