TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Appeals court rules suit against birth-control mandate can continue

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Thursday, June 27, 2013, 7:51 p.m.

DENVER — A federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that Hobby Lobby stores have a good case that the federal health care law violates their religious beliefs in ordering them to provide birth control to employees and that they shouldn't be subject to millions in fines while their claim is considered.

The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver decided the Oklahoma City-based arts and crafts chain can proceed with its lawsuit seeking to overturn the birth-control coverage mandate on religious grounds. The judges unanimously sent the case back to a lower court in Oklahoma, which previously said Hobby Lobby must comply with the requirement or start paying millions of dollars in fines next week.

Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. argues for-profit businesses — not just religious groups — should be allowed to seek an exception if the law violates their religious beliefs. Its owners oppose certain types of contraception, including the morning-after pill.

Hobby Lobby is the largest and best-known of more than 30 businesses in several states that have challenged the contraception mandate.

Five of eight active judges hearing the company's case agreed that arguments for exemption from the mandate by for-profit businesses like Hobby Lobby have merit. “Their exercise of religion is substantially burdened,” the judges wrote.

The judges pointed out that Hobby Lobby would be subject to more fines for refusing the contraception mandate — nearly $475 million a year — than if it provided no employee health coverage at all. That action would prompt an annual fine of about $26 million.

Hobby Lobby and its sister store, Christian booksellers Mardel Inc., won expedited federal review because the chain would have faced fines starting Monday for not covering the required forms of contraception. The 10th Circuit judges said the Oklahoma court was wrong not to grant the companies an injunction in the face of serious financial penalties.

“Sincerely religious persons could find a connection between the exercise of religion and the pursuit of profit,” the judges wrote. “Would an incorporated kosher butcher really have no claim to challenge a regulation mandating non-kosher butchering practices?”

The 10th Circuit heard the case before eight active judges instead of the typical three-judge panel, indicating the case's importance.

Hobby Lobby and other companies challenging the contraception mandate say the morning-after pill is tantamount to abortion because it can prevent a fertilized egg from becoming implanted in a womb.

The Department of Justice argued that allowing for-profit corporations to exempt themselves from requirements that violate their religious beliefs would be in effect allowing the business to impose its religious beliefs on employees.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. US Airways’ pornographic tweet won’t cost anyone a job
  2. Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
  3. Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
  4. AC/DC not disbanding, lead singer Brian Johnson says
  5. Android systems running 4.1.1 softward carry Heartbleed bug
  6. Suspect in Jewish community sites shootings appears in court in wheelchair
  7. New York Police Department commissioner disarms post-9/11 intel program
  8. Vermont Senate OKs GMO labels as industry insists genetically modified crops are safe
  9. Census director defends changes, denies questions altered to inflate Obamacare success
  10. Tea Party flap averted fraud probe by IRS, Justice, emails show
  11. Pulitzers awarded for coverage of NSA spy programs, Boston Marathon bombing
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.