ShareThis Page

Indictment details key role played by younger Tsarnaev brother

| Friday, June 28, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

WASHINGTON — A federal grand jury in Boston indicted Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on Thursday in the Boston Marathon bombings, charging that he and his brother were inspired by al-Qaida propaganda and believed the blasts that killed three and injured more than 260 would avenge U.S. actions overseas.

The 30-count indictment charged the Chechen immigrant and naturalized American citizen with detonating a weapon of mass destruction resulting in deaths. It said he scrawled what amounted to a confession while hiding in a drydocked boat before his capture in Watertown, Mass.

“I don't like killing innocent people,” Tsarnaev, 19, wrote in a series of notes on the boat's inside wall and beams, according to the indictment. But, he said, “the U.S. government is killing our innocent civilians. ... I can't stand to see such evil go unpunished.”

“We Muslims are one body, you hurt one you hurt us all,” he wrote. “Stop killing our innocent people and we will stop.”

The indictment alleged that Tsarnaev and his 26-year-old brother, Tamerlan, designed the bombs to “shred skin, shatter bone and cause extreme pain and suffering, as well as death.” Other charges included bombing a public place and malicious destruction of property. Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed during police pursuit days after the bombings.

Seventeen of the 30 counts could bring a sentence of death or life in prison.

Tsarnaev was charged in state court with killing Sean Collier, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer who was shot to death as the brothers allegedly tried to steal his service weapon while attempting to flee.

Unlike the federal government, Massachusetts does not have the death penalty, so it seemed likely that the federal case would go first.

“All signs point to a capital prosecution of Tsarnaev by the feds,” said Richard Broughton, a former Justice Department Criminal Division official who teaches at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.

Tsarnaev, who was seriously wounded during the manhunt, did not enter a plea. He is being housed at a federal hospital for prisoners in Devens, Mass., and is to be arraigned July 10.

His father, Anzor Tsarnaev, speaking by phone from Russia, defended his children. “All I can say is my sons were innocent and they were simply set up,” he said. “Nothing will ever make me believe my sons could have done that ugly crime.”

The federal indictment laid out this scenario: The Tsarnaev brothers began planning the bombing in February, and were encouraged when Dzhokhar downloaded jihadist texts, including “The Slicing Sword” and “Defense of the Muslim Lands, the First Obligation after Imam.”

The writings called for violence against enemies of Islam and glorified martyrdom. Some were written by Abdullah Azzam, the so-called Father of Global Jihad, and Anwar al-Awlaki, the American who was an al-Qaida propagandist until he was killed in a 2011 drone strike in Yemen.

The al-Qaida magazine Inspire provided the brothers with detailed instructions on building improvised explosive devices with pressure cookers or sections of pipe, explosive powder from fireworks, and shrapnel, the indictment says.

On Feb. 6, Tamerlan purchased 48 mortars containing about 80 pounds of low-explosive powder from Phantom Fireworks in Seabrook, N.H. On March 20, the brothers target-practiced with two rented 9-mm handguns and 200 rounds of ammunition at a firing range in Manchester, N.H. On April 5, Tamerlan placed an online order for electronic components adaptable for IEDs, and they were mailed to the brothers' home in Cambridge, Mass.

Nine days later, Dzhokhar opened a prepaid cellphone account. The next day, April 15, the brothers placed their bombs about a block and a half from each other near the finish line, the indictment alleges. A minute before the first explosion, Dzhokhar used his prepaid cellphone to call Tamerlan. Seconds later, Tamerlan detonated the first bomb. Seconds after that, Dzhokhar allegedly detonated his.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.