TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

State choice on Medicaid expansion to result in patchwork of federal health care assistance

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Monday, July 1, 2013, 7:57 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — Nearly two in three uninsured low-income people who would qualify for subsidized coverage under President Obama's health care law may be out of luck next year, because their states have not expanded Medicaid.

An Associated Press analysis of figures from the Urban Institute finds a big coverage gap developing, with 9.7 million out of 15 million potentially eligible adults living in states that are refusing the expansion or are still undecided with time running short.

That a majority of the neediest people who could be helped by the law may instead remain uninsured is a predicament unforeseen by Obama and congressional Democrats who designed a sweeping extension of the social safety net. The law's historic promise of health insurance for nearly all U.S. residents would not be fulfilled as envisioned.

It's the direct consequence of last summer's Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to opt out of the Medicaid expansion, combined with unyielding resistance to the law from many Republican state lawmakers.

Starting next year, middle-class people without job-based coverage will be able to get tax credits to help them buy private insurance. But the law calls for low-income people to enroll in Medicaid, expanded to accommodate a largely excluded group: adults with no children at home. Expanded Medicaid would cover about half the 25 million to 30 million people who could be helped by the law.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have decided to accept the expansion, which is fully financed by Washington for the first three years and phases down gradually to a 90 percent federal share.

Among those are six states led by Republican governors.

“Because of the Supreme Court's decision making Medicaid expansion optional with the states, we're going to see some pretty significant differences in this country from one place to another in terms of access to health care and access to health insurance,” said Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services official overseeing the rollout of the law.

Republican state lawmakers oppose the expansion for several reasons. Many believe Medicaid has too many problems. Others worry that Washington will renege on financing. Some believe health care is an individual responsibility, not a government obligation.

GOP health policy expert Gail Wilensky says she did not expect so many states to turn down the Medicaid expansion. While critical of some main features of the Affordable Care Act, Wilensky believes it's important for the country to get uninsured people covered.

“This is depriving the poorest of their citizens of an important benefit,” Wilensky said.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Postal Service falls short of slower mail delivery standards
  2. CDC lauds schools for better nutrition
  3. University of Texas removes statue of Confederate President Davis
  4. Memorial service for slain Virginia journalists brings call for action
  5. Motive in ambush of Houston area deputy remains unknown
  6. Pope Francis’ lack of familiarity with United States unusual
  7. Erika wanes as Tropical Storm Fred forms in Atlantic
  8. Obama inches closer to veto-proof support for Iran nuclear deal
  9. Supreme Court can resolve Kentucky county clerk’s refusal to issue marriage licenses to gays
  10. Obama administration developing sanctions against China over cyberespionage
  11. Researchers close in on universal flu vaccine