TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

State choice on Medicaid expansion to result in patchwork of federal health care assistance

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Monday, July 1, 2013, 7:57 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Nearly two in three uninsured low-income people who would qualify for subsidized coverage under President Obama's health care law may be out of luck next year, because their states have not expanded Medicaid.

An Associated Press analysis of figures from the Urban Institute finds a big coverage gap developing, with 9.7 million out of 15 million potentially eligible adults living in states that are refusing the expansion or are still undecided with time running short.

That a majority of the neediest people who could be helped by the law may instead remain uninsured is a predicament unforeseen by Obama and congressional Democrats who designed a sweeping extension of the social safety net. The law's historic promise of health insurance for nearly all U.S. residents would not be fulfilled as envisioned.

It's the direct consequence of last summer's Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to opt out of the Medicaid expansion, combined with unyielding resistance to the law from many Republican state lawmakers.

Starting next year, middle-class people without job-based coverage will be able to get tax credits to help them buy private insurance. But the law calls for low-income people to enroll in Medicaid, expanded to accommodate a largely excluded group: adults with no children at home. Expanded Medicaid would cover about half the 25 million to 30 million people who could be helped by the law.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have decided to accept the expansion, which is fully financed by Washington for the first three years and phases down gradually to a 90 percent federal share.

Among those are six states led by Republican governors.

“Because of the Supreme Court's decision making Medicaid expansion optional with the states, we're going to see some pretty significant differences in this country from one place to another in terms of access to health care and access to health insurance,” said Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services official overseeing the rollout of the law.

Republican state lawmakers oppose the expansion for several reasons. Many believe Medicaid has too many problems. Others worry that Washington will renege on financing. Some believe health care is an individual responsibility, not a government obligation.

GOP health policy expert Gail Wilensky says she did not expect so many states to turn down the Medicaid expansion. While critical of some main features of the Affordable Care Act, Wilensky believes it's important for the country to get uninsured people covered.

“This is depriving the poorest of their citizens of an important benefit,” Wilensky said.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
  2. First date in New Jersey ends with him pilfering her TV and Yorkshire terrier
  3. Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid
  4. Automaker GM’s wait on Saturn Ion safety recall took years
  5. Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
  6. SpaceX supply ship makes Easter cargo delivery to space station
  7. Colorado deaths stoke marijuana worries
  8. Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
  9. Grandmother left vengeful note in boys’ slayings, then committed suicide, police say
  10. Medicaid paid $12M for Illinois dead, audit finds
  11. Android systems running 4.1.1 softward carry Heartbleed bug
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.