TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

State choice on Medicaid expansion to result in patchwork of federal health care assistance

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Monday, July 1, 2013, 7:57 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Nearly two in three uninsured low-income people who would qualify for subsidized coverage under President Obama's health care law may be out of luck next year, because their states have not expanded Medicaid.

An Associated Press analysis of figures from the Urban Institute finds a big coverage gap developing, with 9.7 million out of 15 million potentially eligible adults living in states that are refusing the expansion or are still undecided with time running short.

That a majority of the neediest people who could be helped by the law may instead remain uninsured is a predicament unforeseen by Obama and congressional Democrats who designed a sweeping extension of the social safety net. The law's historic promise of health insurance for nearly all U.S. residents would not be fulfilled as envisioned.

It's the direct consequence of last summer's Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to opt out of the Medicaid expansion, combined with unyielding resistance to the law from many Republican state lawmakers.

Starting next year, middle-class people without job-based coverage will be able to get tax credits to help them buy private insurance. But the law calls for low-income people to enroll in Medicaid, expanded to accommodate a largely excluded group: adults with no children at home. Expanded Medicaid would cover about half the 25 million to 30 million people who could be helped by the law.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have decided to accept the expansion, which is fully financed by Washington for the first three years and phases down gradually to a 90 percent federal share.

Among those are six states led by Republican governors.

“Because of the Supreme Court's decision making Medicaid expansion optional with the states, we're going to see some pretty significant differences in this country from one place to another in terms of access to health care and access to health insurance,” said Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services official overseeing the rollout of the law.

Republican state lawmakers oppose the expansion for several reasons. Many believe Medicaid has too many problems. Others worry that Washington will renege on financing. Some believe health care is an individual responsibility, not a government obligation.

GOP health policy expert Gail Wilensky says she did not expect so many states to turn down the Medicaid expansion. While critical of some main features of the Affordable Care Act, Wilensky believes it's important for the country to get uninsured people covered.

“This is depriving the poorest of their citizens of an important benefit,” Wilensky said.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Hearing to determine fate of sergeant accused of killing 2 deaf Iraqi boys
  2. Justices uphold Michigan ban on affirmative action, giving states room to maneuver
  3. Images best of readied D-Day ships
  4. Precautions lack year since fatal blast at plant
  5. Mo. mayor steps down over anti-Semitic comments
  6. Details about USS Cole suspect’s stint in CIA custody must be turned over
  7. IRS awards millions in bonuses to its people who don’t pay taxes
  8. Mumps outbreak among Ohio’s largest
  9. Gun background checks miss fugitives
  10. Senator pitches gasoline tax increase
  11. Little toxicity data exists for tainted W.Va. water
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.