Workers at Alzheimer's care center in Ga. charged with abuse, neglect
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, July 2, 2013, 5:21 p.m.
COMMERCE, Ga. — More than 20 former employees of a Georgia center for people with Alzheimer's disease face dozens of criminal charges for what state investigators call cruel treatment of patients.
The charges stem from a three-month investigation of Alzheimer's Care of Commerce, a facility about 65 miles northeast of Atlanta, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said in a written statement.
Agents used a search warrant Tuesday morning to search for evidence at the center.
GBI officials say the investigation uncovered accounts of physical abuse, such as staff members striking patients and throwing water on them.
Warrants were issued for the arrests of 21 former and present employees, authorities said. Charges including cruelty to people 65 or older and involve accusations of abuse, neglect and financial exploitation.
“Information obtained through the investigation indicated that patients were restrained with bed sheets and subjected to inhumane and undignified conditions to include ‘double diapering,' which is a practice whereby multiple diapers were placed on the patients at once to keep the staff from changing soiled diapers as often,” the GBI said.
GBI agents say they also learned that patients were being cared for by people with prior felony convictions that include voluntary manslaughter and identity theft.
The facility's owner, Donna Wright, was charged with cruelty to a person 65 years of age or older and abuse, neglect, financial exploitation and failure to report under the Protection of Disabled Adults and Elderly Persons statute, authorities said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- Gas giant’s CEO joins suit related to fracking
- 1st 9/11-related trial in U.S. unfolds
- Experts offer to help Cuba recover artworks
- Ex-magistrate censured in Messiah name change
- Woman hurt in Montana avalanche dies
- D.C. cherry bloom peak forecast for April 8-12
- Massachusetts chemist acted alone in faking test results, report says