'Girl with Pearl Earring' visits Atlanta
ATLANTA — Atlanta's High Museum of Art is giving visitors a chance to experience the engaging over-the-shoulder glance of Johannes Vermeer's famous “Girl with a Pearl Earring.”
Along with 34 other works from the Dutch Golden Age, including four by Rembrandt van Rijn, the 17th century masterpiece is part of the exhibition “Girl with a Pearl Earring: Dutch Paintings from the Mauritshuis,” which runs through Sept. 29.
“What you get from this exhibition is an overview of Dutch paintings at the hand of the very best examples you can imagine,” said Emilie Gordenker, director of the Royal Picture Gallery Mauritshuis in The Hague, which owns the paintings.
The mystery surrounding the identity of the girl with the soft, translucent skin and enigmatic gaze has contributed to the painting's fame, which has been boosted by author Tracy Chevalier's 1999 book of the same name. The novel, adapted to a film starring Scarlett Johannson as the girl and Colin Firth as Vermeer, is a fictional story about the painter and his model.
“Girl with a Pearl Earring” last visited the United States during a Vermeer retrospective at the National Gallery in Washington in 1996. Like Leonardo da Vinci's “Mona Lisa,” to which it is often compared, it is a relatively small painting, only about 18 by 15 inches, and occupies its own gallery at the end of the High exhibition.
“There are 35 paintings in the exhibition. Any one of them would be a highlight in our collection,” High director of collections and exhibitions David Brenneman said.
The four Rembrandts in the exhibition trace the Dutch master's career. “Portrait of an Elderly Man” from 1667 showcases Rembrandt's exquisite attention to detail and masterful use of light.
The exhibition had its U.S. premiere at the de Young Fine Arts Museum in San Francisco earlier this year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- Data on impact of Colo. gun law, background checks questioned
- Cedar Point attraction mishap injures 2 riders
- Lawmakers say answering Census survey should be voluntary
- Cellphone users can soon declare freedom from wireless carriers
- Gun advocates chalk up 2nd win this year with D.C. ruling
- Lightning strikes 14 in Calif., leaves 2 critically hurt
- Trial to begin for video in Oklahoma City bombing
- Tentative deal reached on VA reforms
- U.S. coal exports undermine clean air efforts, experts say
- Automatically renewing Obamacare plans may backfire