Health insurers fear young adults will pay penalty, opt out of coverage under new law
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, July 5, 2013, 9:06 p.m.
MIAMI — Dan Lopez rarely gets sick and hasn't been to a doctor in 10 years, so buying health insurance feels like a waste of money.
Even after the federal health overhaul takes full effect next year, the 24-year-old said he probably will decide to pay the $100 penalty for those who skirt the law's requirement that all Americans purchase coverage.
“I don't feel I should pay for something I don't use,” said the Milwaukee resident, who makes about $48,000 a year in working two part-time jobs.
Because he makes too much to qualify for government subsidies, Lopez would pay a premium of about $3,000 a year if he chooses to buy health insurance.
“I shouldn't be penalized for having good health,” he said.
Persuading young, healthy adults such as Lopez to buy insurance under the Affordable Care Act is becoming a major concern for insurance companies as they scramble to comply with the law, which prohibits them from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions and limits what they can charge to older policy holders.
Experts warn a lot of these “young invincibles” could opt to pay the fine instead of spending hundreds or thousands of dollars each year on insurance premiums. If enough young adults avoid the new insurance marketplace, it could throw off the entire equilibrium of the Affordable Care Act. Insurers are betting on the business of that group to offset the higher costs they will incur for older, sicker beneficiaries.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that about 6 million people of various ages will pay the tax penalty for not having insurance in 2014, the first year the law championed by President Obama will be fully implemented.
It's hard to estimate how many of those will be the young and healthy adults whom insurers are trying to reach, but that subgroup makes up a very small portion of the overall market. Even though it's small, experts say it could be enough to throw the system's financing off-kilter.
About 3 million 18- to 24-year-olds in the United States purchase their own insurance. Many pay high prices for scant benefits, with high deductibles and co-pays because they make too much to qualify for Medicaid and have no coverage options from their employers or parents. The Urban Institute estimates that the majority of adults in their 20s will qualify for government subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.
Premium hikes could be a disincentive for young people weighing their options. Premiums for people aged 21 to 29 with single coverage who are not eligible for government subsidies would increase by 42 percent under the law, according to an analysis by actuaries at the consulting firm Oliver Wyman. By comparison, an adult in his or her early 60s would have about a 1 percent average increase in premiums under new federal health rules.
Insurers including America's Health Insurance Plans and The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association recently wrote to federal health officials warning that they feared low enrollment by young adults and proposed beefed-up penalties for opting out. Insurers worry that the $100 penalty might not be a strong enough deterrent. The penalties jump to $695 or 2.5 percent of taxable income — whichever is more — by 2016.
“The key to keeping health care affordable is you really want to balance the pool, where you have enough young and healthy people to balance off the care of the older, sicker people who are likely to utilize much more health care services,” said Justine Handelman, The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association's vice president for legislative and regulatory policy.
She said younger people use about a fifth of the services that older beneficiaries do.
Jonathan Gruber, an economics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who helped craft that state's law, said he thinks the first-year federal penalty should be higher.
The penalty under the Massachusetts law, which served as the model for Obama's overhaul, was $218 for the first year in 2007. Gruber said that amount proved effective.
“People hate paying money and getting nothing for it,” he said.
About 40,000 of about 6 million Massachusetts residents paid the penalty in the first year, he said.
Many young adults have chosen relatively bare-bones health plans before the Affordable Care Act, but the new law requires all plans to offer a minimum set of benefits, thus raising the price for coverage.
The cost of health coverage is difficult to estimate because it includes so many factors, but a 27-year-old making $30,000 a year in 2014 will have a $3,400 premium and will be eligible for subsidies that cover about 26 percent of the bill. That person would end up paying $2,509, or about $209 a month. That does not include deductibles, co-pays and other variables, which can vary widely.
The estimates come from the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation's online Health Reform Subsidy Calculator.
Health advocates note that many people who have difficulty affording health insurance now will qualify for federal subsidies. The financial assistance will go to those making less than $48,000 a year who cannot get affordable coverage through their job.
The potential for skyrocketing prices caught the attention of a Democratic state lawmaker in New Jersey, Assemblywoman Celeste Riley. She is so worried about the cost for young people that she helped pass legislation to remove a requirement that students at two-year colleges have health insurance to attend class. But Gov. Chris Christie vetoed the bill last week.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Maryland bill would link criminal, gun owners data
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- Volunteers reconstruct World War II bomber plane
- Traffic cameras rejected in Ohio ruling
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Mummified remains found in foreclosed home
- Crisis stymies Obama getaway