Obama takes flak over foreign policy
WASHINGTON — The military overthrow of the democratically elected government in Egypt, for decades America's most important Arab ally, has spurred a fierce debate about whether the Obama administration's Mideast policy has been too passive and ineffective.
President Obama declared that U.S. allegiance was to “democratic principles” when Egypt's military ousted President Mohamed Morsy on Wednesday, but critics charge that the White House made only halfhearted attempts to steer Morsy's increasingly authoritarian government toward democracy, rule of law and respect for human rights.
“They've been late and slow, and not taken these problems seriously,” Michele Dunne, a former State Department official and administration adviser on Egypt who heads the nonpartisan Atlantic Council's Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East, said on Friday.
Obama repeatedly failed “to use leverage to ensure that Egyptian authorities adhere to democratic principles,” said the Project on Middle East Democracy, an advocacy group in Washington.
The critics, who include Democratic foreign policy stalwarts as well as Republicans, say the upheaval in Egypt, on top of the administration's inability to stem the civil war in Syria or persuade Iran to curb its nuclear program, adds a blot to Obama's foreign policy record.
President Obama on Saturday reiterated that the United States is not aligned with and is not supporting any particular Egyptian political party or group and again condemned the ongoing violence across Egypt.
Obama made those points during a telephone conference with the National Security Council about developments in Egypt, according to a statement issued by the White House.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.