Checks for federal health aid get easier
The Obama administration announced on Friday that it would significantly scale back the health law's requirements that new insurance marketplaces verify consumers' income and health insurance status.
Instead, the federal government will rely more heavily on consumers' self-reported information until 2015, when it plans to put stronger verification systems in place.
The delay falls on the heels of a Tuesday announcement that the federal government would postpone for one year a requirement that employers with 50 or more full-time workers provide health coverage.
“I think that Health and Human Services is doing the best that it can under the circumstances,” said Sara Rosenbaum, a health policy professor at George Washington University.
The verification systems are meant to determine who qualifies for benefits under the Affordable Care Act. The law includes tax subsidies to buy health insurance for Americans who earn less than 400 percent of the poverty line, about $45,000 for an individual.
Those earning less than 133 percent of the poverty line — about $15,000 — will qualify for Medicaid coverage in Washington, and 23 states that have decided to expand the program.
The federal government needs to know who receives health insurance coverage from an employer. Consumers who receive affordable health insurance from their company under a policy that costs less than 9.5 percent of their income do not qualify for tax credits under the Affordable Care Act.
Regulations published Friday scaled back the federal government's role in determining whether information submitted to new health marketplace is accurate.
After encountering “legislative and operational barriers,” the federal government will not require Washington and the 16 states that are running their own marketplaces to verify a consumer's statement that they do not receive health insurance from their employer.
“The exchange may accept the applicant's attestation regarding enrollment in eligible employer-sponsored plan ... without further verification,” according to the final rule.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- McCarthy withdraws candidacy for speaker
- Despite sunny forecast, South Carolina ordeal far from over
- Defense bill heads to Obama under threat
- Duke Energy reaches $7 million deal with N.C. on coal ash
- Utah’s Chaffetz in race for House speaker
- Mine blast trial puts spotlight on Massey’s ‘King Coal’
- Volkswagen exec ready to testify in D.C.
- Cultural shift needed for Cleveland Police Department, monitoring team member says
- GOP-led House authorizes special panel to investigate Planned Parenthood
- House Democrat files ethics complaint over Benghazi investigation
- Speaker’s job contest may be start of battles