Companies told to cease selling Fiesta ripoffs
Companies in Arkansas and Illinois have agreed to stop selling foreign-made dinnerware that resembles the product of the last major dinnerware manufacturer in the United States, lawyers for the company said on Thursday.
The Homer Laughlin China Co. of Newell, W.Va., claimed in a federal lawsuit that Carnaval dinnerware made in China mimics its trademark Fiesta dinnerware. The manufacturer sued Hanna's Candle Co. of Fayetteville, Ark., and The Bazaar Inc. of River Grove, Ill., for selling the imitations.
Instead of demanding that the companies destroy the offending dinnerware, Homer Laughlin has agreed that they can donate it to food kitchens and homeless shelters in the Fayetteville area, said Charles Gibbons, one of the manufacturer's attorneys.
“We thought the food kitchens and so forth could put it to good use,” he said.
Michael Dever, another attorney for Homer Laughlin, said the donation will amount to about 10,000 to 25,000 sets of dinnerware.
J. Alexander Hershey, one of the attorneys for the two retailers, confirmed there was a settlement but declined further comment.
U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon in Pittsburgh on Thursday approved a joint motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
Founded in 1871, Homer Laughlin China specializes in retail and commercial cooking and dinnerware and is best known for its colorful Fiesta line. It employs more than 1,000 people and has annual sales of about $100 million.
Its Fiesta dinnerware is so popular that tourists flock year-round to the outlet store at the Ohio River town plant. Some of them sleep outside for days before a sale at its outlet store.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-325-4301.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.