Soros' son raises nearly $2M for super PAC
WASHINGTON — A super PAC co-founded by George Soros' son has raised $1.8 million during the first six months of this year, the group announced this week. Its objective: to reduce the outsized role money plays in politics.
The fundraising haul by Friends of Democracy puts the super PAC on track to achieve its goal of collecting $5 million to back congressional candidates in 2014 who support overhauling the nation's campaign-finance system, said Jonathan Soros, who runs a private-investment firm. The Soros name is perhaps best known in politics for the big role George Soros played in the 2004 presidential election. The billionaire financier pumped $24 million into Democratic groups in that election in an unsuccessful effort to oust President George W. Bush from the White House.
Jonathan Soros said the irony of a Soros forming a super PAC to reduce the influence of super PACs is not lost on him.
“We've been a part of the system for a long time,” he said. “It doesn't mean the system is right. We are devoted to changing it.”
Jonathan Soros contributed $756,000 to the super PAC last year and says he is seeking a Republican “donor partner” in the next six months to balance the “notion that this is somehow about Democrats.”
Soros said he's out to prove that there are “genuine political consequences — for defending the status quo.”
He formed the super PAC with David Donnelly, executive director of the Public Campaign Fund.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ancient Israeli skull hard proof of migration
- Treasure hunter accused of swindling investors captured
- N.D. didn’t inspect pipe before rupture
- Obama AG pick gets positive conservative marks
- 9 black men get records cleared in 1961 protest
- In Boston, the latest Big Dig is all about snow
- Residents in Seattle: Compost or else ...
- Girl’s fatal shooting by Denver officers prompts review of policy
- Prosecutors fight new try to relocate Boston trial
- Police to Waze: Not so fast on cop tracker, which they say makes it harder to catch speeders
- Poll finds most Americans want health insurance subsidies restored if Supreme Court votes against Obamacare provision