TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Arsenic levels in apple juice to get closer scrutiny

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Chicago Tribune
Friday, July 12, 2013, 9:21 p.m.
 

Almost two years after consumer groups raised alarms over arsenic levels found in apple juice, the Food and Drug Administration on Friday proposed an “action level” of 10 parts per billion of inorganic arsenic, the same limit that environmental regulators place on drinking water.

The agency said it was confident that apple juice is generally safe for children and adults to drink but the new limit will make it easier to take enforcement action when higher levels of arsenic are discovered.

“FDA's action level sends a strong signal to industry to help keep out of the food supply even the occasional lot of apple juice with arsenic levels above those permitted in drinking water,” FDA spokeswoman Theresa Eisenman said in an email. “The action level will also provide FDA investigators with the information they need when considering regulatory action.”

Of 94 samples of apple juice the FDA tested in late 2011, none was found to exceed 10 ppb of inorganic arsenic, a known carcinogen, the agency said.

In 2008 the FDA established a “level of concern” for inorganic arsenic in apple juice at 23 ppb. Like an action level, a level of concern can trigger regulatory responses if exceeded, such as ordering further testing or detaining products.

But both levels are seen as less stringent than a formal standard, or tolerance level, which if violated can trigger immediate legal action.

Michael Taylor, the FDA's deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine, said developing tolerance levels involves “an extraordinarily long and cumbersome rulemaking process” while action levels can be initiated less formally and changed to adapt to new evidence.

Urvashi Rangan, director of consumer safety and sustainability for Consumers Union, called the FDA's announcement a move in the right direction.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
  2. Boy Scouts of America votes to end controversial ban on openly gay leaders
  3. House backs bill to help vets who’ve suffered sexual assault
  4. ‘Aggressive’ search under way for 2 Florida teens lost on fishing trip
  5. House Benghazi panel says State Department to hand over documents Tuesday
  6. Oklahoma court: Ten Commandments monument at Capitol must go