Boston Strangler remains exhumed
PEABODY, Mass. — Investigators have unearthed the remains of a man who once confessed to being the Boston Strangler in a bid to use forensic evidence to connect him to the death of a woman believed to be the serial killer's last victim.
A bevy of law enforcement officials surrounded Albert DeSalvo's grave on a plot near a lake for Friday's exhumation, which lasted about an hour.
DeSalvo admitting killing Mary Sullivan and 10 other women in the Boston area between 1962 and 1964 in a series of slayings. But he recanted in 1973 before dying in prison, where he was serving life for other crimes.
Authorities said that they would take DeSalvo's remains from Peabody to the medical examiner's office in nearby Boston, where they'd take tissue or bone samples for DNA.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Planet Mars likely had ocean, lost it, researchers find
- WVU, Va. coal company at odds over research papers
- Hillary email controversy reminiscent of 1996 episode
- Florida woman wields a shotgun in forcing son to jump from window
- Bullet-ridden dog tied to tracks saved in Florida
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Los Angeles rookie officer claims shooting victim grabbed his gun
- Hillary Clinton may have broken federal record-keeping laws, New York Times reports
- Case on Obamacare tax subsidies heads to Supreme Court
- Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules
- McConnell wants EPA rule rejected