Saudi officials pay princess' $5M bail
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, July 12, 2013, 9:33 p.m.
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Saudi Arabian officials issued a $5 million check to bail a member of the royal family out of the Orange County, Calif., Jail, officials said on Friday.
Meshael Alayban, 42, is reported to be one of six wives of Saudi Prince Abdulrahman bin Nasser bin Abdulaziz al Saud. She was arrested Wednesday because a Kenyan woman reportedly being forced to work as a servant fled one of the princess' four condos in an Irvine residential complex, south of Los Angeles, boarded a bus and eventually made her way to police.
Prosecutors said Alayban “did unlawfully deprive and violate the personal liberty” of the Kenyan by forcing her to cook, clean, do laundry and perform other household chores for meager pay.
The maid said her passport had been confiscated by the princess.
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas likened Alayban to a slave owner.
“It's been 150 years since the Emancipation Proclamation,” he said.
Defense attorney Paul Meyer declined to comment.
The Consulate of Saudi Arabia in Los Angeles refused to answer questions.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
- First date in New Jersey ends with him pilfering her TV and Yorkshire terrier
- Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid
- Automaker GM’s wait on Saturn Ion safety recall took years
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- SpaceX supply ship makes Easter cargo delivery to space station
- Colorado deaths stoke marijuana worries
- Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
- Grandmother left vengeful note in boys’ slayings, then committed suicide, police say
- Medicaid paid $12M for Illinois dead, audit finds
- Android systems running 4.1.1 softward carry Heartbleed bug