Saudi officials pay princess' $5M bail
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, July 12, 2013, 9:33 p.m.
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Saudi Arabian officials issued a $5 million check to bail a member of the royal family out of the Orange County, Calif., Jail, officials said on Friday.
Meshael Alayban, 42, is reported to be one of six wives of Saudi Prince Abdulrahman bin Nasser bin Abdulaziz al Saud. She was arrested Wednesday because a Kenyan woman reportedly being forced to work as a servant fled one of the princess' four condos in an Irvine residential complex, south of Los Angeles, boarded a bus and eventually made her way to police.
Prosecutors said Alayban “did unlawfully deprive and violate the personal liberty” of the Kenyan by forcing her to cook, clean, do laundry and perform other household chores for meager pay.
The maid said her passport had been confiscated by the princess.
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas likened Alayban to a slave owner.
“It's been 150 years since the Emancipation Proclamation,” he said.
Defense attorney Paul Meyer declined to comment.
The Consulate of Saudi Arabia in Los Angeles refused to answer questions.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Senator: CIA improperly searched computer network
- Snowden captivates tech crowd
- Obama hams it up for health care on Funny or Die
- D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal ‘shadow campaign’
- Lanza’s father says he wishes son was never born
- Depth, distance reduce impact of quake off California’s northern coast
- Parents of ‘spoiled’ teen urge her to return home
- Climate contraptions get real consideration
- Fannie, Freddie profits surprise
- Elephants attuned to human voices
- General’s court-martial is thrown into jeopardy