Find of Apollo 11 engines confirmed
A team led by Amazon.com founder and chief executive Jeff Bezos has confirmed that the engines it retrieved from the floor of the Atlantic Ocean belong to the Saturn V rocket that took the Apollo 11 astronauts to the moon 44 years ago.
In March, they made headlines by going 14,000 feet below the sea surface and coming back with two of the Saturn V first-stage engines. Then, on Friday, they announced that a conservationist had managed to uncover the identification markings on one of the five engines — a serial number “2044.”
In a blog post published Friday, Bezos described the process of bringing the numbers to the surface from under layers of buildup: “One of the conservators who was scanning the objects with a black light and a special lens filter has made a breakthrough discovery — ‘2044' — stenciled in black paint on the side of one of the huge thrust chambers. 2044 is the Rocketdyne serial number that correlates to NASA number 6044, which is the serial number for F-1 Engine #5 from Apollo 11. The intrepid conservator kept digging for more evidence, and after removing more corrosion at the base of the same thrust chamber, he found it — ‘Unit No 2044' — stamped into the metal surface.”
NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said the engine's identity was confirmed using data retrieved from NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
The confirmation proves that the F-1 engine, developed by the rocket engine company Rocketdyne, was used to carry the first astronauts to land on the moon. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took humanity's first steps on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Threat leads to evacuation of Sandy Hook school
- Murder charges dropped against sergeant who shot 2 unarmed Iraqi boys
- First Ebola case in U.S. confirmed in Dallas
- Secret Service chief endures blistering glare of Congress’ questions over White House breach
- Medical marijuana use to get court test in Colo.
- Search of unsecure federal labs finds vials of more deadly pathogens: Ricin, botulism, plague bacteria
- Pentagon review puts Gitmo transfers on ice
- New York City mayor boosts city’s living wage to $13.13
- Panel says Wis. lawmaker likely broke House rules by advocating for companies in which he owned stock
- Obama says U.S. wrong about Islamic State threat
- Cost of taking fight to ISIS pegged at $2.4B to $6.8B a year