WASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., agreed with his former opponent, President Obama, that “stand your ground” laws need to be re-examined, nationally and in his home state.
“The ‘stand your ground' law may be something that may need to be reviewed by the Florida legislature or any other legislature that has passed such legislation,” McCain said on CNN's “State of the Union” on Sunday.
McCain praised comments made by President Obama following the George Zimmerman verdict about racial tensions that have been exposed by the shooting of Trayvon Martin.
“What I got out of the president's statement, which I thought was very impressive, is that we need to have more conversation in America,” McCain said. “I need to talk to more of my Hispanic organizations in my state. I need to talk to more African-American organizations.
“We've still got a long way to go, and I think the president very appropriately highlighted a lot of that ... as only the president of the United States can.”
McCain took the opportunity to disagree with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who believes the Obama administration's review of “stand your ground” laws is an attempt to further limit the rights of gun owners.
“Isn't it time for America to come together?” McCain said. “I'd rather have a message of coming together and discussing these issues rather than condemning.”
About 30 states have some form of the law, including Pennsylvania, whose “stand your ground” provision was signed into law by Gov. Tom Corbett in 2011. Pennsylvania's law differs from Florida's because of a requirement that the assailant also must have a lethal weapon.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.