Obama's approval rating at 2-year low
WASHINGTON — Stung by Americans' persistent worries about the economy and a capital gripped by controversy and gridlock, President Obama is suffering his lowest job approval numbers in nearly two years, according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll.
The plummeting numbers — still higher than those of Congress — arrive after weeks of rising gasoline prices, revelations about domestic spying and turmoil in the Middle East.
Obama will deliver the first of a series of speeches on Wednesday aimed at offering his vision for boosting economic growth, even as the new poll found that just 37 percent of the respondents approved of his handling of the economy, while 56 percent disapproved.
Overall, the poll found Obama's job approval at 41 percent last week, a sharp drop from April's 50 percent and his worst showing in the poll since 39 percent in September 2011. Forty-eight percent disapproved in the latest poll, up from April's 46 percent.
Obama won re-election in November with 51 percent of the popular vote.
“Clearly six months into his second term there's been falloff across the board. It's not like one group bailed on him,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion at Marist College in New York, which conducted the poll.
About his only solace is that the approval rating of congressional Republicans, who control the House of Representatives, sank to 22 percent. One-third of registered voters approved of congressional Democrats' performance.
The dismal Washington numbers reflect “the ongoing, cumulative effect of those issues which have not been resolved,” and no solution is in sight, Miringoff said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S., Cuba patching torn relations with historic accord
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- Republican lawmakers vow to block confirmation of any potential ambassador to Cuba
- California downpours arrive with lightning
- Lifting limits on Cuba a boon for U.S.
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar
- Use of U.S. steel to fix Alaska terminal causes rift with Canada
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Airships are Army’s new eyes in the sky to detect, destroy missiles
- Warren’s hangups over trade agenda threaten party ties
- Police publicly altering tactics on use of deadly force